Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754288›Full record

ArticleUrban forestry & urban greening2021

Particularities of having plants at home during the confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Luis Pérez-Urrestarazu, Maria P Kaltsidi, Panayiotis A Nektarios, Georgios Markakis, Vivian Loges, Katia Perini, Rafael Fernández-Cañero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban forestry & urban greening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Urban Microclimates and Their Relationship with Social Isolation: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  3. Exploring the Indoor Plant-People Relationship Through Qualitative Responses.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Interactions with Nature, Good for the Mind and Body: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. COVID-19 and the importance of urban green spaces.Urban forestry & urban greening · 2022
    Article
  18. Understanding the Role of Nature Engagement in Supporting Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis Pérez-UrrestarazuUrban Greening and Biosystems Engineering Research Group, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Fluids Mechanics, ETSIA Ctra. Utrera Km.1, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Maria P KaltsidiUrban Greening and Biosystems Engineering Research Group, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Fluids Mechanics, ETSIA Ctra. Utrera Km.1, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Panayiotis A NektariosHellenic Mediterranean University, Department of Agriculture, Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products, Landscape and Environment, Specialization of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Estavromenos, Heraklion, Crete, 71004, Greece.
Georgios MarkakisHellenic Mediterranean University, Department of Social Work, Estavromenos, Heraklion, Crete, 71410, Greece.
Vivian LogesDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, UFRPE Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife-PE, Brazil.
Katia PeriniArchitecture and Design Department, University of Genoa. Stradone S. Agostino 37, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Rafael Fernández-CañeroUrban Greening and Biosystems Engineering Research Group. Department of Agro-Forestry Sciences. Universidad De Sevilla. ETSIA Ctra, Utrera km.1, 41013, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the role of having plants at home during the confinement period as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic that deprived people of freely visiting open green spaces. Preferences concerning the quantity of the desired vegetation as well as the ways in which the COVID-19 crisis affected the change of perceptions with regard to having plants at home were also evaluated. A questionnaire, which was filled by 4205 participants, provided an undistracted evaluation of the impact of indoor and outdoor plants on their emotional welfare considering behavioural, social, and demographic variables. The emotional state of the respondents was neutral and a significant proportion expressed positive emotions. Having indoor plants was correlated with more positive emotions, and confined inhabitants allocated more time for plant maintenance. By contrast, negative emotions prevailed in respondents who related to a positive COVID-19 case, which was more frequent in females and young participants living in small houses that received low levels of natural light and had few or no plants. A few indoor plants placed in strategic positions were also preferred compared with a high number of plants. By contrast, an increased amount of vegetation accompanied by living walls was preferred for outdoor settings. Living walls were considered as advantageous for increasing indoor vegetation, but they were also associated with technical and economical hurdles.

Indexed as

Contemporary planting systemsEmotional well-beingHuman-plant interactionsIndoor vegetationLiving wallsPsychological impact

Identifiers

PMID34754288
PMCPMC8569528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.