Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754279›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration Model-Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q).

Astrid Jörns-Presentati, Gunter Groen, Atle Ødegård

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Astrid Jörns-PresentatiFaculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-4321
Gunter GroenFaculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-8722
Atle ØdegårdFaculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Specialized University of Logistics, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-1327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Perception of Interprofessional Collaboration-Model Questionnaire (PINCOM-Q) measures professionals' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in the field of child and youth mental health. The aim of this study was to validate the PINCOM-Q in a sample of German child welfare and child and youth mental health professionals.

methodsThe PINCOM-Q was translated into German and its underlying factor structure was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Findings from this study suggest four factors (Interprofessional Climate, Conflict, Role Expectancy and Shared Goals, and Motivation) capture the concept of perceptions of interprofessional collaboration between child welfare and child and adolescent psychiatry.

conclusionThe use of PINCOM-Q (German) can be recommended as a research tool, investigating professional groups working with children and young people with multiple and complex needs.

Indexed as

child and adolescent psychiatrychild welfareinterprofessional collaborationmeasurementvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34754279
PMCPMC8555481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.