ArticleCancer management and research2021
Survival Effects of Radiotherapy on Patients Newly Diagnosed with Distant Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Non-High-Incidence Areas.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Increased Prevalence of EBV Infection in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Six-Year Cross-Sectional Study.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the effects of radiotherapy and its timing on the survival and safety of patients with newly diagnosed distant metastatic NPC in non-high-incidence areas. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 94 newly diagnosed NPC patients with distant metastatic admitted to our hospital from January 2011 to June 2018. They were divided into three groups: no radiotherapy group received chemotherapy alone, early radiotherapy group was combined with radiotherapy during 1 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy, and late radiotherapy group was combined with radiotherapy after 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy were effective. The efficacy and side effects of the three groups were compared, and the prognostic factors were analyzed.
resultsThe 6-month, 1-year and 2-year PFS were 53.6%, 14.3% and 3.6% in no radiotherapy group, 71.0%, 38.7% and 19.4% in early radiotherapy group, 88.6%, 48.6% and 22.9% in late radiotherapy group; the radiotherapy groups were better than the no radiotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (
conclusionEarly and late combined radiotherapy had similar clinical efficacy and both prolonged PFS and OS for patients with newly diagnosed distant metastatic NPC in non-high-risk areas. If chemotherapy response is expected to be poor, radiotherapy can be received early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.