Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34754231›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Barriers to Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Among Physicians: A Physician Survey.

Bashar Qumseya, April Goddard, Amira Qumseya, David Estores, Peter V Draganov, Christopher Forsmark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bashar QumseyaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
April GoddardDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Amira QumseyaCollege of Public Health & Health Professions, Department of Biostatistics, Children's Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David EstoresDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter V DraganovDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Christopher ForsmarkDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical practice guidelines can help physicians provide evidence-based, standardized clinical decisions. We aimed to assess physician attitudes toward and barriers to guideline adherence.

methodsWe conducted a single center, cross-sectional, survey-based study. Physicians from many specialties participated in the study. All outcomes were measured using a validated survey tool. The primary outcome of interest was barriers to guideline adherence. Secondary outcomes included general attitudes toward guidelines and factors that could improve adherence to guidelines. Outcomes were measured by the survey tool. All outcomes were reported on a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsThe email survey was received by 1819 physicians with 400 responders (22% response rate). About 50% (n=200) were in practice for >5 years, while 27% (n=107) were still in training. Trainees were less likely to understand the process of guideline development (RR= 0.76 [0.65-0.88], p=0.0017), to have input in guideline development (RR= 0.52 [0.41-0.65], p<0.0001), and to report up-to-date knowledge in practice guidelines (RR=0.53 [0.30-0.73], p=0.0002). Three factors were identified as major barriers to guideline adherence: complexity of guideline documents (61%, n=240), high number of weak or conditional recommendations (62%, n=245), and time constraints due to clinical responsibilities (65%, n=255). Factors that would improve guideline adherence included access to relevant guidelines at the point of care (87%), improved focus on guidelines during training (82%), and transparency on physician commercial affiliation (62%).

conclusionImproved focus on guidelines during training and access to relevant guidelines at the point of care may be important to improve adherence to guidelines.

Indexed as

barriersclinical practice guidelinesimplementation

Identifiers

PMID34754231
PMCPMC8572046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.