ArticleMinds and machines2022
Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation.
Article in Minds and machines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Challenges in Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Framework for Safe Adoption.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of an artificial intelligence-based system for mammography in the compulsory medical insurance program: results of a 3-year study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Food Safety and Quality Assurance: Technologies, Applications and Future Directions.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Data-driven medical devices and the EU MDR: mapping gaps in standards for regulatory compliance.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Responsible AI measures dataset for ethics evaluation of AI systems.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Stakeholder-specific adoption of AI in HRM: workers' representatives' perspective on concerns, requirements, and measures.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Simplifying software compliance: AI technologies in drafting technical documentation for the AI Act.Empirical software engineering · 2025Article
- Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk.Regulation & governance · 2024Article
- Institutionalised distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence: towards a democratic design of AI governance under the European Union AI Act.AI & society · 2024Article
- Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study.AI and ethics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proposed European Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) is the first attempt to elaborate a general legal framework for AI carried out by any major global economy. As such, the AIA is likely to become a point of reference in the larger discourse on how AI systems can (and should) be regulated. In this article, we describe and discuss the two primary enforcement mechanisms proposed in the AIA: the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.