Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34753960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The importance of being heterozygote: effects of RHD-genotype-sex interaction on the physical and mental health of a non-clinical population.

Jaroslav Flegr, Lenka Příplatová, Jana Hlaváčová, Blanka Šebánková, Emanuel Žďárský, Šárka Kaňková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond Latency: ChronicBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive Effects ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaroslav FlegrDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic. flegr@cesnet.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-0126
Lenka PříplatováDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana HlaváčováDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Blanka ŠebánkováDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Emanuel Žďárský+DPrevence, Department of DNA Prevention, Prague, Czech Republic.
Šárka KaňkováDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 18-13692SWellcome Trust 204056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human populations, especially European, are polymorphic in the RHD gene. A significant fraction of their members carry no copy of the coding section of RHD gene, which results in their Rh-negative blood type. Theoretically, this polymorphism should be unstable. Carriers of the less frequent allele are penalized by reduced fertility because of the immunization of RhD-negative mothers by their RhD-positive babies, which results in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in their subsequent progeny. For about 90 years, some form of balancing selection has been suspected to sustain this polymorphism. Several recent studies showed that the RhD-positive heterozygotes express higher viability than both types of homozygotes. However, the genotype of subjects in these studies was estimated only by indirect methods. Here we compared the physical and mental health of 178 women and 86 men who were directly tested for their RHD genotype. The results showed that RhD-positive homozygotic women had worse and RhD-positive homozygotic men better physical health than RhD-negative homozygotes; the difference between RhD-negative homozygotes and heterozygotes was not significant. Our results confirmed that health of RhD-positive heterozygotes and homozygotes differ. Therefore, any result of the comparison of subjects with RhD-positive and RhD-negative phenotype depends on the heterozygote-to-homozygote ratio in the RhD-positive sample. It is, therefore, crucial to analyze the effects of RHD-genotypes, not phenotypes in future studies.

Indexed as

GenotypeHeterozygoteMental HealthSex FactorsAdultFemaleHumansMaleRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemYoung AdultRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRho(D) antigen

Identifiers

PMID34753960
PMCPMC8578618
OpenAlexW3213641906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.