ArticleBMJ open2021
Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Decentralised-Centralised Oncology Care Model to Improve Cancer Screening, Access, and Continuity of Care in Rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implementation Study at Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Interventions to Improve Timely Detection and Diagnosis of Cancer Among the Adult Population: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Association of Neighborhood Social Vulnerability With Metastatic Cancer at Diagnosis.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing people's movement across the health system: a scoping review of referral systems within a primary health care approach.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Performance of a national primary care chronic disease screening strategy in Chile: a mixed-methods analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Earlier diagnosis of small intestine neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) through transformation of the South Wales NET service.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- [Clinical coordination and strengthening of primary care for cancer diagnosis in Latin America: a scoping reviewCoordenação clínica e fortalecimento da atenção primária no diagnóstico do câncer na América Latina: revisão de escopo].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Evaluation of online text-based information resources of gynaecological cancer symptoms.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Cancer-Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Biosensing chips for cancer diagnosis and treatment: a new wave towards clinical innovation.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Local Investigators Significantly Overestimate Overall Response Rates Compared to Blinded Independent Central Reviews in Uncontrolled Oncology Trials: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo summarise the current evidence regarding interventions for accurate and timely cancer diagnosis among symptomatic individuals.
designA scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodological framework for the conduct of scoping reviews and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost) and PsycINFO (Ovid) bibliographic databases, and websites of relevant organisations. Published and unpublished literature (grey literature) of any study type in the English language were searched for from January 2017 to January 2021. ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA: Study participants were individuals of any age presenting at clinics with symptoms indicative of cancer. Interventions included practice guidelines, care pathways or other initiatives focused on achieving predefined benchmarks or targets for wait times, streamlined or rapid cancer diagnostic services, multidisciplinary teams and patient navigation strategies. Outcomes included accuracy and timeliness of cancer diagnosis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We summarised findings graphically and descriptively.
resultsFrom 21 298 retrieved citations, 88 unique published articles and 16 unique unpublished documents (on 18 study reports), met the eligibility for inclusion. About half of the published literature and 83% of the unpublished literature were from the UK. Most of the studies were on interventions in patients with lung cancer. Rapid referral pathways and technology for supporting and streamlining the cancer diagnosis process were the most studied interventions. Interventions were mostly complex and organisation-specific. Common themes among the studies that concluded intervention was effective were multidisciplinary collaboration and the use of a nurse navigator.
conclusionsMultidisciplinary cooperation and involvement of a nurse navigator may be unique features to consider when designing, delivering and evaluating interventions focused on improving accurate and timely cancer diagnosis among symptomatic individuals. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the interventions identified through this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.