ArticleBMJ open2021
Maternal perinatal depression and health services utilisation in the first 2 years of life: a cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in diagnosing and treating postpartum depression in the primary care Setting- a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMaternal perinatal depression is a common phenomenon, influencing infants' development. Studies have shown an inconsistent association between perinatal depression and healthcare resource utilisation. This study aimed to assess whether perinatal depression in mothers is associated with their infants' healthcare utilisation, during the first 2 years of life.
designA cohort study based on computerised medical records.
settingNationwide primary care clinics in the second largest health maintenance organisation in Israel.
participants593 children of women with depression (the exposed group) and 2310 children of women without depression. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome variables included general practitioner/paediatrician (GP/Paed) visits (regular and telehealth), emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admission rates and child-development clinic visits. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic use and anaemia status. The exposure variable, perinatal depression, was based on Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. A score of ≥10 was classified as depression.
resultsMultivariable analysis of the number of regular visits and telehealth to the GP/Paed showed an adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of 1.08, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.13 and aIRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10, respectively. Children of mothers with perinatal depression had more hospital admissions (aIRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.46) and more visits to child development clinics (aIRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.70). There was a non-significant increase in ER visits (IRR 1.26, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.42), and non-significant decrease in antibiotics prescriptions (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05) and anaemia status (IRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.20).
conclusionThis study shows higher health services utilisation among children of mothers with perinatal depression, including regular GP/Paed visits, hospital admission rates, and child-development clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.