Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34753703›Full record

Trial reportClinical lung cancer2022

EGFR High Copy Number Together With High EGFR Protein Expression Predicts Improved Outcome for Cetuximab-based Therapy in Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis From SWOG S0819, a Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Cetuximab in Advanced NSCLC.

Fred R Hirsch, Mary W Redman, James Moon, Francesco Agustoni, Roy S Herbst, Thomas J Semrad, Marileila Varella-Garcia, Chris J Rivard, Karen Kelly, David R Gandara and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical lung cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00946712 (A Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing Carboplatin/Paclitaxel or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab With or Without Concurrent Cetuximab in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00946712 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing Carboplatin/Paclitaxel or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab With or Without Concurrent Cetuximab in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2009 to 2022Enrolled1,333ConditionsRecurrent Large Cell Lung Carcinoma, Recurrent Lung Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma, Stage IV Large Cell Lung CarcinomaArmsBevacizumab, Carboplatin, Cetuximab, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Paclitaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor as a therapeutic target.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  8. Prognostic Impact ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Fred R HirschDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, NY. Electronic address: fred.hirsch@mssm.edu.
Mary W RedmanSWOG Statistical Center and Clinical Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
James MoonSWOG Statistical Center and Clinical Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Francesco AgustoniMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Roy S HerbstYale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
Thomas J SemradUniversity of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Marileila Varella-GarciaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Chris J RivardDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Karen KellyUniversity of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA.
David R GandaraUniversity of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Philip C MackCenter for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, NY; University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA.
University of California, Davis · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Health System · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UCDCCC NCTN UG1 PROGRAMUG1CA233340 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GANDARA, DAVID R, VALICENTI, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3.7M
UCDCCC NCTN U10 ProgramU10CA180846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GANDARA, DAVID R, VALICENTI, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180846NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phase III S0819 trial investigated addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy (CT) in NSCLC. Subgroup analyses suggested an OS benefit among patients with EGFR copy number gain in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), (HR = 0.58 [0.39-0.86], P = .0071). A more detailed model based on EGFR FISH, EGFR IHC and KRAS mutation status was evaluated to yield a more precise predictive paradigm of cetuximab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC.

methodsFISH was performed using the Colorado Scoring Criteria; H-Score was used to quantify EGFR IHC expression (cut-off ≥ 200). A Cox model was used to assess treatment effects for OS and PFS within biomarker and clinical subgroups. KRAS mutation was analyzed using Therascreen. The false discovery rate controlled for multiple comparisons. S0819 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00946712.

resultsOf 1,313 eligible patients, assay results were obtained for FISH on 976 patients (41% positive), for IHC on 945 patients (31% positive), and KRAS mutation status on 627 patients (26% positive). In SCC patients, OS was significantly improved with addition of cetuximab when both EGFR FISH and EGFR IHC were positive (N = 58), (OS HR: 0.32 [95% CI 0.18-0.59]; P = .0002, q = 0.08), median 12.6 versus 4.6 months. The results were independent of KRAS mutation status. In Non-SCC, no predictive value of EGFR IHC, EGFR FISH status and/or KRAS status was seen.

conclusionsIn NSCLC SCC, a combination index of EGFR FISH plus EGFR IHC results was associated with improved OS when cetuximab was added to CT, representing a potential predictive molecular paradigm for patients suitable for EGFR-antibody therapy.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCetuximabErbB ReceptorsFemaleForecastingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEGFR antibodiesEGFR FISHEGFR IHCKRASSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID34753703
PMCPMC8766941
OpenAlexW3205352786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.