Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34753516›Full record

ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2021

Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia.

Xun Chen, Xuanqi Wang, Yilin Xu, Mingrui Cheng, Tian Han, LingLing Niu, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xun Chen *Fudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Xuanqi Wang *Fudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Yilin XuFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Mingrui ChengFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Tian HanFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
LingLing NiuFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Xiaoying WangFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China. doctxiaoyingwang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-6318
Xingtao ZhouFudan University Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, No. 19 BaoQing Road, XuHui District, Shanghai, 200031, China. doctzhouxingtao@163.com.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

Joint research project of new frontier technology in municipal hospitals SHDC12018103Major clinical research project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center SHDC2020CR1043BNational Natural Science Foundation of China 81770955Project of Shanghai Science and Technology 20410710100Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology 2020-015Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 19140900700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of implantable collamer lens with a central hole (EVO ICL) implantation for correcting high myopia (HM) and super high myopia (SHM).

methodsThis prospective study evaluated 83 eyes of 46 patients who were divided into groups based on their spherical equivalent refractive error (SE): HM group (- 12 D ≤ SE < - 6 D) and SHM group (SE < - 12 D). They were followed up for 5 years after ICL implantation; assessments of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refractive error, axial length, intraocular pressure, corneal endothelial cell density, and vault were conducted, and a questionnaire was administered. RESUITS: At 5 years postoperatively, the safety indices of the HM and SHM groups were 1.03 ± 0.10 and 1.32 ± 0.39, and the efficacy indices were 0.83 ± 0.25 and 0.86 ± 0.32, respectively. In the HM group, 60.47% and 79.07% of the eyes were within ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D of the attempted correction, while it was achieved for 22.50% and 47.50% of the eyes in the SHM group, respectively. The SE of the HM group decreased from  - 9.72 ± 1.41 D preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.39 D 1 month postoperatively and - 0.67 ± 0.57 D 5 years postoperatively, while in the SHM group, it decreased from - 15.78 ± 3.06 D preoperatively to  - 0.69 ± 0.97 D 1 month postoperatively and - 1.74 ± 1.19 D 5 years postoperatively.

conclusionEVO ICL implantation is safe, effective, and predictable for correcting HM and SHM. CDVA improved more after surgery for SHM, but the growth of axial length still needs attention.

Indexed as

EVO ICLHigh myopiaPosterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantationSuper high myopia

Identifiers

PMID34753516
PMCPMC8576084
OpenAlexW3214017885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.