ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Identification of asthma control factor in clinical notes using a hybrid deep learning model.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution, hotspots, and future directions of artificial intelligence in asthma research: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis [2016-2026].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Current trends and future directions of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Factors associated with allergic diseases in Chinese children aged 6-14 years.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Leveraging large language models for knowledge-free weak supervision in clinical natural language processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Engineering of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing Models to Accurately Identify Arrhythmia Recurrence.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Lightweight transformers for clinical natural language processing.Natural language engineering · 2024Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Knowledge-free Weak Supervision in Clinical Natural Language Processing.Research square · 2024Article
- A Sustainable Approach to Asthma Diagnosis: Classification with Data Augmentation, Feature Selection, and Boosting Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- May Artificial Intelligence Influence Future Pediatric Research?-The Case of ChatGPT.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automated labelling of radiology reports using natural language processing: Comparison of traditional and newer methods.Health care science · 2023Review
- A hybrid algorithm for clinical decision support in precision medicine based on machine learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- The use of artificial intelligence for delivery of essential health services across WHO regions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- BioADAPT-MRC: adversarial learning-based domain adaptation improves biomedical machine reading comprehension task.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Quality Management of Pulmonary Nodule Radiology Reports Based on Natural Language Processing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Use of ChatGPT in Urology and its Relevance in Clinical Practice: Is it useful?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are significant variabilities in guideline-concordant documentation in asthma care. However, assessing clinician's documentation is not feasible using only structured data but requires labor-intensive chart review of electronic health records (EHRs). A certain guideline element in asthma control factors, such as review inhaler techniques, requires context understanding to correctly capture from EHR free text.
methodsThe study data consist of two sets: (1) manual chart reviewed data-1039 clinical notes of 300 patients with asthma diagnosis, and (2) weakly labeled data (distant supervision)-27,363 clinical notes from 800 patients with asthma diagnosis. A context-aware language model, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was developed to identify inhaler techniques in EHR free text. Both original BERT and clinical BioBERT (cBERT) were applied with a cost-sensitivity to deal with imbalanced data. The distant supervision using weak labels by rules was also incorporated to augment the training set and alleviate a costly manual labeling process in the development of a deep learning algorithm. A hybrid approach using post-hoc rules was also explored to fix BERT model errors. The performance of BERT with/without distant supervision, hybrid, and rule-based models were compared in precision, recall, F-score, and accuracy.
resultsThe BERT models on the original data performed similar to a rule-based model in F1-score (0.837, 0.845, and 0.838 for rules, BERT, and cBERT, respectively). The BERT models with distant supervision produced higher performance (0.853 and 0.880 for BERT and cBERT, respectively) than without distant supervision and a rule-based model. The hybrid models performed best in F1-score of 0.877 and 0.904 over the distant supervision on BERT and cBERT.
conclusionsThe proposed BERT models with distant supervision demonstrated its capability to identify inhaler techniques in EHR free text, and outperformed both the rule-based model and BERT models trained on the original data. With a distant supervision approach, we may alleviate costly manual chart review to generate the large training data required in most deep learning-based models. A hybrid model was able to fix BERT model errors and further improve the performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.