ArticleBMC public health2021
How can the public health impact of vaccination be estimated?
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global patterns of pertussis incidence and vaccination strategies: implications of divergent surveillance data.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy and Booster Dose Adherence Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Crete, Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- How mathematical modelling can inform outbreak response vaccination.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Review
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students, health professionals, and health care workers: an umbrella review.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024Review
- Vaccine value profile for Chikungunya.Vaccine · 2024Article
- Contribution of vaccination to improved survival and health: modelling 50 years of the Expanded Programme on Immunization.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Article
- The Full Value of Vaccine Assessments Concept-Current Opportunities and Recommendations.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Estimating the health effects of COVID-19-related immunisation disruptions in 112 countries during 2020-30: a modelling study.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Estimating the impact of vaccination: lessons learned in the first phase of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium.Gates open research · 2024Article
- Global and regional burden of attributable and associated bacterial antimicrobial resistance avertable by vaccination: modelling study.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Modeling the potential health impact of prospective Strep A vaccines.NPJ vaccines · 2023Article
- Article
- To Boost or Not to Boost: Acceptability of a COVID-19 Booster Dose among Osteopathic Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Medical School in New York.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Lives saved with vaccination for 10 pathogens across 112 countries in a pre-COVID-19 world.eLife · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeaths due to vaccine preventable diseases cause a notable proportion of mortality worldwide. To quantify the importance of vaccination, it is necessary to estimate the burden averted through vaccination. The Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) was established to estimate the health impact of vaccination.
methodsWe describe the methods implemented by the VIMC to estimate impact by calendar year, birth year and year of vaccination (YoV). The calendar and birth year methods estimate impact in a particular year and over the lifetime of a particular birth cohort, respectively. The YoV method estimates the impact of a particular year's vaccination activities through the use of impact ratios which have no stratification and stratification by activity type and/or birth cohort. Furthermore, we detail an impact extrapolation (IE) method for use between coverage scenarios. We compare the methods, focusing on YoV for hepatitis B, measles and yellow fever.
resultsWe find that the YoV methods estimate similar impact with routine vaccinations but have greater yearly variation when campaigns occur with the birth cohort stratification. The IE performs well for the YoV methods, providing a time-efficient mechanism for updates to impact estimates.
conclusionsThese methods provide a robust set of approaches to quantify vaccination impact; however it is vital that the area of impact estimation continues to develop in order to capture the full effect of immunisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.