Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34753334›Full record

Trial reportJournal of learning disabilities

Examining the Effects of Integrating Anxiety Management Instruction Within a Reading Intervention for Upper Elementary Students With Reading Difficulties.

Sharon Vaughn, Amie E Grills, Philip Capin, Greg Roberts, Anna-Mária Fall, Johny Daniel

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of learning disabilities. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Socioeconomic status and reading outcomes: Neurobiological and behavioral correlates.New directions for child and adolescent development · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon VaughnThe University of Texas-Austin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-5549
Amie E GrillsBoston University, MA, USA.
Philip CapinThe University of Texas-Austin, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4955-9879
Greg RobertsThe University of Texas-Austin, USA.
Anna-Mária FallThe University of Texas-Austin, USA.
Johny DanielThe University of Texas-Austin, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USBoston University · US

Funding

Evidence-based Interventions to Enhance Outcomes among Struggling ReadersR01HD087706 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI GRILLS, AMIE ELIZABETH, VAUGHN, SHARON · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present findings from the first cohort of third- and fourth-grade students with reading difficulties (128 students from 31 classrooms) who participated in a 2-year intervention examining the effects of a reading intervention with and without anxiety management. Using a randomized controlled trial, students were assigned to one of three conditions: (a) small-group reading intervention with anxiety management instruction (RANX), (b) small-group reading intervention with math fact practice (RMATH), and (c) business-as-usual (BAU) comparison condition (no researcher provided treatment). Personnel from the research team provided participants in the RANX and RMATH the same reading intervention with the variation in the two treatments being whether the same amount of time per lesson was allocated to anxiety management (RANX) or practicing math facts (RMATH). Students in the RANX significantly outperformed students in the BAU on reading comprehension (effect size [ES] = 1.22) and students in the RMATH outperformed BAU on reading comprehension (ES = 0.77). Groups did not differ significantly on other reading outcomes. Reading anxiety moderated the main effect of the RANX intervention on the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) word reading when contrasted against the BAU group, indicating a significant difference favoring RANX where treatment's effect decreased by 0.94 units (about 1 point on the outcome) on word reading for each additional point increase in reading anxiety.

Indexed as

DyslexiaReadingAnxietyChildComprehensionHumansStudentschildhood anxietyreading comprehensionreading intervention

Identifiers

PMID34753334
PMCPMC9085973
OpenAlexW3212803229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.