Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34753296›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

A feasibility study to assess the design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a caregiving intervention for people following hip fracture surgery.

Toby Smith, Lucy Clark, Reema Khoury, Mei-See Man, Sarah Hanson, Allie Welsh, Allan Clark, Sally Hopewell, Klaus Pfeiffer, Pip Logan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Toby SmithFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Lucy ClarkFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Reema KhouryFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Mei-See ManFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Sarah HansonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Allie WelshFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Allan ClarkFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Sally HopewellNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Klaus PfeifferDepartment of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.
Pip LoganSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Maria CrottyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Matthew CostaNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah E LambCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBFlinders University · AURobert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic, multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an informal caregiver training programme to support the recovery of people following hip fracture surgery.

methodsThis will be a mixed-methods feasibility RCT, recruiting 60 patients following hip fracture surgery and their informal caregivers. Patients will be randomized to usual NHS care, versus usual NHS care plus a caregiver-patient dyad training programme (HIP HELPER). This programme will comprise of three, one-hour, one-to-one training sessions for the patient and caregiver, delivered by a nurse, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist. Training will be delivered in the hospital setting pre-patient discharge. It will include practical skills for rehabilitation such as: transfers and walking; recovery goal setting and expectations; pacing and stress management techniques; and introduction to the HIP HELPER Caregiver Workbook, which provides information on recovery, exercises, worksheets, and goal-setting plans to facilitate a 'good' recovery. After discharge, patients and caregivers will be supported in delivering rehabilitation through three telephone coaching sessions. Data, collected at baseline and four months post-randomization, will include: screening logs, intervention logs, fidelity checklists, quality assurance monitoring visit data, and clinical outcomes assessing quality of life, physical, emotional, adverse events, and resource use outcomes. The acceptability of the study intervention and RCT design will be explored through qualitative methods with 20 participants (patients and informal caregivers) and 12 health professionals. DISCUSSION: A multicentre recruitment approach will provide greater external validity across population characteristics in England. The mixed-methods approach will permit in-depth examination of the intervention and trial design parameters. The findings will inform whether and how a definitive trial may be undertaken to test the effectiveness of this caregiver intervention for patients after hip fracture surgery. Cite this article:

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsCaregiverclinical outcomesCOVID-19Healthcare professionalsHIPHip fracturehip fracture surgerymulticentre randomized controlled trialphysiotherapistsRCTRecoveryRehabilitationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34753296
PMCPMC8636304
OpenAlexW3188637527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.