Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34752663›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2022

Enhancing the sweat resistance of sunscreens.

Fatemeh Keshavarzi, Nina Østergaard Knudsen, Niloufarsadat Mirmahdi Komjani, Morten F Ebbesen, Jonathan R Brewer, Shadi Jafarzadeh, Esben Thormann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enhancing the sweat resistance of sunscreens.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fatemeh KeshavarziDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3203-7441
Nina Østergaard KnudsenRiemann A/S, Hillerød, Denmark.
Niloufarsadat Mirmahdi KomjaniRiemann A/S, Hillerød, Denmark.
Morten F EbbesenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-7429
Jonathan R BrewerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.
Shadi JafarzadehRiemann A/S, Hillerød, Denmark.
Esben ThormannDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3493

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark #6151-00007B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile sunbathing of performing outdoor sport activities, sunscreens are important for protection of uncovered skin against ultraviolet (UV) radiation. However, perspiration negatively affects the performance of a sunscreen film by weakening its substantivity and uniformity through the activation of two mechanisms, namely sunscreen wash-off and sunscreen redistribution. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe used a perspiring skin simulator to investigate the effect of sunscreen formulation on its efficiency upon sweating. Specifically, we modified the sunscreen formulation by incorporating a hydrophobic film former and adding water-absorbing particles. Sunscreen performance before and after perspiration is assessed by in vitro sun protection factor measurements, direct detection of changes in the sunscreen distribution using UV reflectance imaging, and by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy for microscopic characterization of the UV filter relocation.

resultsThe results show that incorporating a hydrophobic film former can decrease sunscreen wash-off due to sweating, while an excessive amount of film former might negatively affect the sunscreen distribution. The addition of water-absorbing particles, on the other hand, had either a negative or positive impact on the sunscreen substantivity, depending on the particle properties. While the addition of large water-absorbing particles appeared to increase sunscreen redistribution, smaller particles that could form a gel-like structure upon contact with water, appeared to change sunscreen wetting and sweat droplet spreading, thereby decreasing sunscreen wash-off and sunscreen redistribution.

conclusionsWe find that using a combination of hydrophobic film formers, which increase water resistance, and small water-absorbing particles, which change the wetting behavior, can make sunscreen formulations more sweat-resistant and less runny.

Indexed as

Sunscreening AgentsSweatingHumansSkinSweatUltraviolet RaysSunscreening Agentsfilm formergelatinperspiring skin simulatorsunscreensweat resistancewater-absorbing particles

Identifiers

PMID34752663
PMCPMC9907632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.