Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34752643›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2022

Iron fists and velvet gloves: Investigating the associations between the stringency of governments' responses to COVID-19, stress, and compliance in the early stages of the pandemic.

Dominik-Borna Ćepulić, Giovanni A Travaglino, Stavroula Chrona, Ena Uzelac, Alma Jeftić, Cecilia Reyna, Marta Kowal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominik-Borna ĆepulićDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0975-9323
Giovanni A TravaglinoDepartment of Law & Criminology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-0634
Stavroula ChronaSchool of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-4938
Ena UzelacFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5104-2612
Alma JeftićPeace Research Institute, International Christian University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-2061
Cecilia ReynaNational University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6097-4961
Marta KowalInstitute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-1471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To tackle the spread of COVID-19, governments worldwide have implemented restrictive public health behavioural measures. Whether and when these measures lead to positive or negative psychological outcomes is still debated. In this study, drawing on a large sample of individuals (N

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsGovernmentHumansIronSARS-CoV-2IroncomplianceCOVID-19regulationsstressstringency index

Identifiers

PMID34752643
PMCPMC8646544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.