Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34752571›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians2020

Investigating Pharmacists' Views on Telepharmacy: Prioritizing Key Relationships, Barriers, and Benefits.

Arefeh Ameri, Farzad Salmanizadeh, Sareh Keshvardoost, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telepharmacy among community pharmacists.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arefeh AmeriKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Farzad SalmanizadehKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Sareh KeshvardoostKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5727-1616
Kambiz BahaadinbeigyKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5430-3758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

2-person discussions barrierbenefitsprioritizationrelationshipstelemedicinetelepharmacy

Identifiers

PMID34752571
PMCPMC7453475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.