Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34752459›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder.

Zachary Anderson, Kim Fairley, Cynthia M Villanueva, R McKell Carter, June Gruber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zachary AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-8668
Kim FairleyDepartment of Economics, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8646-0603
Cynthia M VillanuevaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
R McKell CarterDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-6529
June GruberDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
University of Colorado Boulder · USLeiden University · NLNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralAdultBipolar DisorderDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleProbability

Identifiers

PMID34752459
PMCPMC8577741
OpenAlexW3212565206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.