Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34752151›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Interobserver reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diabetic nephropathy.

Lin Lin, Yiru Wang, Lin Yan, Nan Li, Xiaoqi Tian, Qiuyang Li, Jie Tang, Yukun Luo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Reveals Perfusion of Human Bone in Acute Fracture Healing: A Pilot Study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin LinDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiru WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin YanDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqi TianDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiuyang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie TangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yukun LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the interobserver reproducibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

methodsA total of 40 patients with diabetic nephropathy were enrolled in this retrospective study. We measured peak intensity (PEAK), time-to-peak (TP), area under the curve (AUC) and mean transit time (MTT) of renal CEUS in each patient. Each parameter was performed by two independent observers. The interobserver reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Bland-Altman plots by mean difference with 95% limits of agreement (LOAs).

resultsThe parameters of the left and right kidneys showed moderate or good reliability. The best was the left kidney AUC parameters (ICC,0.945),with a 95% CI of 0.896-0.971.The Bland-Altman plots showed that the mean differences between the right renal parameters (PEAK, TP, AUC and MTT) obtained between the observers 1 and 2 were -6.63%,2.54%,-11.30%,-2.22%, and the 95% LOAs are -30.78 to 17.52%, -30.15 to 35.23%, -43.95 to 21.35%, -44.50 to 40.06%. While the left ones were -2.89%, 0.32%, -8.26%, 1.25% , and the 95% LOAs were -38.50 to 32.72%, -31.98 to 32.62%, -57.89 to 41.37%, -37.21 to 39.71%, respectively.

conclusionQuantitative CEUS can show good interobserver reproducibility, which is better for the right kidney. It seems necessary to establish standardized techniques for obtaining contrast-enhanced quantitative analysis of renal blood perfusion. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Quantitative assessment of renal perfusion by CEUS in patients with diabetic nephropathy provides diagnostic information. Furthermore, renal perfusion assessment in patients with diabetic nephropathy using CEUS has good reproducibility.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaObserver VariationArea Under CurveDiabetic NephropathiesFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID34752151
PMCPMC8722245
OpenAlexW3211503445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.