ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021
The ultrafast, high-pitch turbo FLASH mode of third-generation dual-source CT: Effect of different pitch and corresponding SFOV on image quality in a phantom study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective assessment of low-dose and low-contrast agent protocols for photon-counting CT angiography of the aorta.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Thoracic-abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced dual-source computed tomography with a high-pitch acquisition protocol and free breathing for reducing motion artifacts and scan time in patients with cancer: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Profound iodine enhancement of the myocardium on a native CT scan one hour after invasive coronary angiography and revascularization.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of chest computed tomography in Turbo FLASH mode with conventional mode for coronary artery disease screening: radiation dose, image quality, and calcium scoring performance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The ultrafast, high-pitch turbo FLASH mode of third-generation dual-source CT: Effect of different pitch and corresponding SFOV on image quality in a phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect of different pitches and corresponding scan fields of view (SFOVs) on the image quality in the ultrafast, high-pitch turbo FLASH mode of the third-generation dual-source CT using an anthropomorphic phantom.
methodsThe phantom was scanned using the ultrafast, high-pitch turbo FLASH protocols of the third-generation dual-source CT with the different pitches and corresponding SFOVs (pitches: 1.55 to 3.2 with increments of 0.1, SFOVs: 50 cm to 35.4 cm). The objective parameters such as the CT number, image noises, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artifacts index (AI), and image features from the head, chest, and abdomen were compared between the CT images with a pitch of 1.55 and SFOV of Ø 50 cm and a pitch of 3.2 and SFOV of Ø 35.4 cm. Then, the 18 series of CT images of the head, chest, and abdomen were evaluated by three radiologists independently.
resultsThe differences in the CT numbers were not statically significant between the CT images with a pitch of 1.55 and SFOV of Ø 50 cm and a pitch of 3.2 and SFOV of Ø 35.4 cm from most body parts and potential combinations (p > 0.05), Most of the image noises and the AI from the images with the pitch of 1.55 were significantly lower than those with the pitch of 3.2 (p < 0.05), and the SNR and CNR from the images with the pitch of 1.55 were higher than those with the pitch of 3.2. There were significant differences in the first-order features and texture features of the head (59.3%, 28.3%), chest (66%, 35.7%), and abdomen (71.6%, 64.7%) (p < 0.05). The subjective image quality was excellent when the pitch was less than 2.0 and gradually decreased with the increasing pitch. In addition, the image quality decreased significantly when the pitch was higher than 3.0 (all k≥0.69), especially in the head and chest.
conclusionsIn the ultrafast, high-pitch turbo FLASH mode of the third-generation DSCT, increasing the pitch and lowering the corresponding SFOV will change the image features and cause more artifacts degrading the image quality. Specific to the clinical needs, decreasing the pitch not only can expand the SFOV but also can improve the image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.