Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751923›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2022

OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.

Jason L He, Rebecca J Hirst, Rohan Puri, James Coxon, Winston Byblow, Mark Hinder, Patrick Skippen, Dora Matzke, Andrew Heathcote, Corey G Wadsley and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jason L HeDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AF, UK. opensourceTAP@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-0166
Rebecca J HirstThe Drug research University of Tasmania Group, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Rohan PuriOpen Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
James CoxonSensorimotor Neuroscience and Ageing Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Winston ByblowSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark HinderOpen Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Patrick SkippenDepartment of Exercise Sciences, Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dora MatzkeNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Andrew HeathcoteDepartment of Psychology, Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corey G WadsleySchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tim SilkSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Christian HydeSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Dinisha ParmarSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Ernest PedapatiCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Donald L GilbertCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
David A HuddlestonCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Stewart MostofskyDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Inge LeunissenCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hayley J MacDonaldDepartment of Movement Sciences, Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
Nahian S ChowdhuryDepartment of Exercise Sciences, Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Matthew GrettonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tess NikitenkoOpen Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Bram ZandbeltDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luke StricklandFuture of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Nicolaas A J PutsDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Funding

Anomalous Motor Physiology In ADHDR01MH078160 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2006 to 2024
$5.8M
Anomalous Sensorimotor Physiology in Fragile X SyndromeK23MH112936 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI PEDAPATI, ERNEST VIJAY · 2017 to 2021
$916k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112936NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stop-signal paradigm has become ubiquitous in investigations of inhibitory control. Tasks inspired by the paradigm, referred to as stop-signal tasks, require participants to make responses on go trials and to inhibit those responses when presented with a stop-signal on stop trials. Currently, the most popular version of the stop-signal task is the 'choice-reaction' variant, where participants make choice responses, but must inhibit those responses when presented with a stop-signal. An alternative to the choice-reaction variant of the stop-signal task is the 'anticipated response inhibition' task. In anticipated response inhibition tasks, participants are required to make a planned response that coincides with a predictably timed event (such as lifting a finger from a computer key to stop a filling bar at a predefined target). Anticipated response inhibition tasks have some advantages over the more traditional choice-reaction stop-signal tasks and are becoming increasingly popular. However, currently, there are no openly available versions of the anticipated response inhibition task, limiting potential uptake. Here, we present an open-source, free, and ready-to-use version of the anticipated response inhibition task, which we refer to as the OSARI (the Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition) task.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceHumansReaction TimeanticipationBehavioral Inhibitionexecutive functioningInhibitionopensourceStoppingstop-signal task

Identifiers

PMID34751923
PMCPMC9170665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.