ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
Comparison of the bacterial viability assessments for the disinfected quarantined water along with an effect of total residual oxidants.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PCR Mediated Nucleic Acid Molecular Recognition Technology for Detection of Viable and Dead Foodborne Pathogens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The water discarded from the quarantine station inspecting aquatic products can be served as an influx channel of invasive microorganisms to our own ecosystem. This study thus compared the viability of three different pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Vibrio harveyi, and Enterococcus faecalis) in either seawater or freshwater after their disinfection. For that, they were treated by ozonation (2.08 mM of ozone), ultraviolet irradiation (UVC-254), or thermal treatment (90℃) for 10 min, during which their resultant viability was monitored using colorimetric ATP assay, colony counting, and real-time quantitative RT-PCR. From this, ATP measurement and real-time quantitative RT-PCR have proved to be a much stronger correlation built in the fraction of each of their assays versus the colony counting, although they differed in the type of disinfection implemented. Especially, ATP assay was the most sensitively influenced by high levels of total residual oxidants (TRO) undesirably produced during the ozonation of V. harveyi and E. faecalis in seawater, although easily and shortly measured within 1 h, with higher accuracy. Aside from that, the real-time quantitative RT-PCR had a stronger correlation versus either that of seawater ozonation or thermal treatment. It is decided referring to measurement time and convenience in the field that ATP assay can be more reliably used in bacterial cell viability measurement in the quarantine after the ozonation in seawater to specifically allow the bacterial deactivation, not to overwhelmingly produce TRO due to the residual ozone provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34751845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.