Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751823›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Effects of different maternal nutrition approaches on weight gain and on adipose and muscle tissue development of young bulls in the rearing phase.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim Polizel, Ricardo de Francisco Strefezzi, Roberta Cavalcante Cracco, Arícia Christofaro Fernandes, Cassiano Bordignon Zuca, Henrique Hespanhol Castellar, Geovana Camila Baldin, Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim PolizelDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil. guilhermepolizel875@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-9898
Ricardo de Francisco StrefezziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Roberta Cavalcante CraccoDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Arícia Christofaro FernandesDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Cassiano Bordignon ZucaDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Henrique Hespanhol CastellarDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Geovana Camila BaldinDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Miguel Henrique de Almeida SantanaDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, College of Animal Science and Food Engineering - USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of prenatal nutrition on body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), rump fat thickness (RFT), backfat thickness (BFT), ribeye area (REA), muscle cell area (MCA), and the number of cells in REA (NCREA) of young Nellore bulls during the rearing period. After pregnancy confirmation (30 days of pregnancy), 126 Nellore cows were separated into three prenatal nutritional treatments (NP (control; 0.03% of BW), only mineral supplementation; PP (0.3% of BW), protein-energy supplementation in the final third; and FP (0.3% of BW) protein-energy supplementation during the entire pregnancy). After calving, all animals were submitted to the same environmental conditions (sanitary and nutritional) and the different supplementation protocols ceased. The males (63 bulls) were evaluated during the entire rearing phase (210 ± 28 days to 540 ± 28 days of age) to weight gain (BW and ADG), carcass characteristics (RFT, BFT, and REA), and for histological assessments (MCA and NCREA; 7 animals per treatment randomly selected). All phenotypes were subjected to an analysis of variance. The different prenatal stimuli had no effect on BFT, RFT, MCA, and NCREA (P > 0.05); however, prenatal nutrition influenced BW of the animals during the rearing phase (P < 0.01) and showed a tendency on ADG (P = 0.09) and REA (P = 0.08). In conclusion, the offspring from FP treatment showed greater BW during the rearing phase in comparison to the NP group. This is related to a greater protein offered in prenatal nutrition, increasing muscle development during the gestational period.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaWeight GainAdipose TissueAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightCattleDietFemaleMaleMusclesPregnancyBeef cattleBody weightCarcass traitsFetal programmingOffspring performance

Identifiers

PMID34751823
OpenAlexW3212623791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.