Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751568›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2022

Photons or Electrons? A Critical Comparison of Electrochemistry and Photoredox Catalysis for Organic Synthesis.

Nicholas E S Tay, Dan Lehnherr, Tomislav Rovis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Photoelectrochemical HChemical science · 2026
    Review
  2. TiOPrecision chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of the Character of the Excited State of Singly Reduced RhJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas E S TayDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.
Dan LehnherrProcess Research and Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8392-1208
Tomislav RovisDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-8669

Funding

Selective Functionalization of Aliphatic Amines - Supplement to Support Mariah RamosR01GM125206 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ROVIS, TOMISLAV · 2017 to 2024
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redox processes are at the heart of synthetic methods that rely on either electrochemistry or photoredox catalysis, but how do electrochemistry and photoredox catalysis compare? Both approaches provide access to high energy intermediates (e.g., radicals) that enable bond formations not constrained by the rules of ionic or 2 electron (e) mechanisms. Instead, they enable 1e mechanisms capable of bypassing electronic or steric limitations and protecting group requirements, thus enabling synthetic chemists to disconnect molecules in new and different ways. However, while providing access to similar intermediates, electrochemistry and photoredox catalysis differ in several physical chemistry principles. Understanding those differences can be key to designing new transformations and forging new bond disconnections. This review aims to highlight these differences and similarities between electrochemistry and photoredox catalysis by comparing their underlying physical chemistry principles and describing their impact on electrochemical and photochemical methods.

Indexed as

ElectronsPhotonsCatalysisChemistry Techniques, SyntheticElectrochemistry

Identifiers

PMID34751568
PMCPMC10021920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.