Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751499›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Is it beneficial to use apertures in proton radiosurgery with a scanning beam? A dosimetric comparison in neurinoma and meningioma patients.

Roberto Righetto, Francesco Fellin, Daniele Scartoni, Maurizio Amichetti, Marco Schwarz, Dante Amelio, Paolo Farace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto RighettoProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Francesco FellinProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Daniele ScartoniProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Maurizio AmichettiProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Marco SchwarzProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Dante AmelioProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Paolo FaraceProton Therapy Unit, S. Chiara Hospital-Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Chiara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the dosimetric advantages of apertures in intracranial single fraction proton radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix neuroma and 10 meningioma patients were investigated. For each patient, six plans were computed, with two spot spacing and three aperture settings (no apertures, 5 and 8 mm margin between aperture and clinical target volume [CTV]). All plans were optimized on the CTV with the same beam arrangement and the same single-field robust optimization (2 mm setup errors, 3.5% range uncertainties). Robustness analysis was performed with 0.5 and 1.0 mm systematic setup errors and 3.5% range uncertainties. CTV coverage in the perturbed scenarios and healthy brain tissue sparing in the surrounding of the CTV were compared.

resultsMeningiomas were larger and at a shallow depth than neuromas. In neuromas, spot spacing did not affect OAR doses or the robustness of CTV coverage and the apertures reduced brain dose without any significant impact on CTV robustness. In meningiomas, smaller spot spacing produced a reduction in brain V5Gy and improved robustness of CTV coverage; in addition, an 8 mm margin aperture reduced low and medium brain tissue doses without affecting robustness in the 0.5 mm perturbed scenario. A 5 mm margin aperture caused a reduction of plan robustness.

conclusionThe optimal use of apertures is a trade-off between sparing of low and medium dose to the healthy brain and robustness of target coverage, also depending on size and depth of the lesion.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeurilemmomaProton TherapyRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansOrgans at RiskProtonsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedProtonsaperturespencil beam scanningproton therapyradiosurgeryrobustness

Identifiers

PMID34751499
PMCPMC8833271
OpenAlexW3213966550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.