Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751488›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2022

Trends in seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and infection fatality rate in the Norwegian population through the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Gro Tunheim, Gunnar Øyvind Isaksson Rø, Trung Tran, Anne-Marte Bakken Kran, Jan Terje Andersen, Eline Benno Vaage, Anette Kolderup, John Torgils Vaage, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Olav Hungnes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Potential value streams of an integrated Canadian serosurveillance network.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gro TunheimDivision of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-8243
Gunnar Øyvind Isaksson RøDivision of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Trung TranDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Marte Bakken KranDivision of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Terje AndersenDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eline Benno VaageDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anette KolderupDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
John Torgils VaageDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fridtjof Lund-JohansenDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Olav HungnesDivision of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

Oslo University HospitalSouth-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 induces antibodies that can be used as a proxy for COVID-19. We present a repeated nationwide cross-sectional study assessing the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2, the infection fatality rate (IFR), and infection hospitalization rate (IHR) during the first year of the pandemic in Norway.

methodsResidual serum samples were solicited in April/May 2020 (Round 1), in July/August 2020 (Round 2) and in January 2021 (Round 3). Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using a flow cytometer-based assay. Aggregate data on confirmed cases, COVID-19-associated deaths and hospitalizations were obtained from the Emergency preparedness registry for COVID-19 (Beredt C19), and the seroprevalence estimates were used to estimate IFR and IHR.

resultsAntibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were measured in 4840 samples. The estimated seroprevalence increased from 0.8% (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.4%-1.3%) after the first wave of the pandemic (Rounds 1 and 2 combined) to 3.2% (95% CrI 2.3%-4.2%) (Round 3). The IFR and IHR were higher in the first wave than in the second wave and increased with age. The IFR was 0.2% (95% CrI 0.1%-0.3%), and IHR was 0.9% (95% CrI 0.6%-1.5%) for the second wave.

conclusionsThe seroprevalence estimates show a cumulative increase of SARS-CoV-2 infections over time in the Norwegian population and suggest some under-recording of confirmed cases. The IFR and IHR were low, corresponding to the relatively low number of COVID-19-associated deaths and hospitalizations in Norway. Most of the Norwegian population was still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection after the first year of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNorwayPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19infection fatality rateinfection hospitalization rateNorwaySARS-CoV-2seroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID34751488
PMCPMC8652705
OpenAlexW3213456642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.