Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751442›Full record

ReviewJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

Advances in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs.

Harry Cridge, David C Twedt, Angela J Marolf, Leslie C Sharkey, Jörg M Steiner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Serum αVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harry CridgeDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0236-2307
David C TwedtDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Angela J MarolfDepartment of Environmental and Radiologic Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Leslie C SharkeyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.
Jörg M SteinerGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-2086
Colorado State University · USMichigan State University · USTexas College · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 20 years, the diagnosis of pancreatitis has become more frequent as a result of improved diagnostic modalities such as abdominal ultrasound examination, advanced imaging, and immunoassays for the measurement of pancreatic lipase. Our aim is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of the clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) in dogs with a particular focus on pancreatic lipase assay validation and clinical performance, in addition to advanced imaging modalities. We also discuss the potential indications for cytology and histopathology in dogs with suspected AP.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAnimalsDogsLipasePancreasUltrasonographyLipaseacute pancreatitiscatalyticCTAcytologyDGGRimmunologiclipase

Identifiers

PMID34751442
PMCPMC8692219
OpenAlexW3212186828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.