Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34751016›Full record

SynthesisJBRA assisted reproduction2022

Association of ovarian stimulation and embryonic aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization cycles with preimplantation genetic testing: A narrative systematic review.

Jorge Rodriguez-Purata, Maria Jose Gomez-Cuesta, Enrique Cervantes-Bravo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorge Rodriguez-PurataClinica de la Fertilidad "CdelaF", Prolongacion Vasco de Quiroga 4001, Torre A Piso 10, Colonia Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05370, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-0884
Maria Jose Gomez-CuestaClinica de la Fertilidad "CdelaF", Prolongacion Vasco de Quiroga 4001, Torre A Piso 10, Colonia Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05370, Mexico City, Mexico.
Enrique Cervantes-BravoClinica de la Fertilidad "CdelaF", Prolongacion Vasco de Quiroga 4001, Torre A Piso 10, Colonia Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05370, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of gonadotropins used for COS on the rate of embryo aneuploidy in patients without the negative effects of age as a confounding factor, is still a subject of lively debate. We ran a systematic search for studies in MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. A librarian coordinated the search in December of 2020. We included all original peer-reviewed papers in English, irrespective of study-design. There were no restrictions concerning method of amplification or platform used to analyze the amplified DNA. We used the PICO model to select the study population. We included women/couples submitted to COS for IVF with the intention to genetically analyze her/their embryos through PGT. The primary outcome was the rate of aneuploidy. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) score to evaluate the quality of the studies included. The search yielded 73 citations, and 14 were eligible for analysis, which included data on 4805 cycles. Media quality NOS score was 8. Although it has been demonstrated that natural cycles are associated with aneuploidy, it does seem that more robust stimulations are indeed associated with a higher proportion of aneuploidy. Nevertheless, a higher response is associated with an increased number of euploid embryos available for transfer, which translates into more embryo-transfer cycles with a prospective higher cumulative live birth rate. Further evidence is needed to ascertain if there is a negative impact of COS, especially at the cellular level.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingLive BirthAneuploidyFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiesaneuploidyassisted reproductive techniquesin vitro fertilizationovarian stimulationpreimplantation diagnosispreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID34751016
PMCPMC9118955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.