Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750946›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2022

Exploring chronic disease prevalence in people with intellectual disabilities in primary care settings: A scoping review.

Milou van den Bemd, Maarten Cuypers, Erik W M A Bischoff, Marloes Heutmekers, Bianca Schalk, Geraline L Leusink

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Chronic disease management in patients with intellectual disabilities: a matched study in Dutch general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milou van den BemdRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0971-3029
Maarten CuypersRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-4375
Erik W M A BischoffRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-8475
Marloes HeutmekersRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-409X
Bianca SchalkRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4359-1715
Geraline L LeusinkRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-1110

Funding

Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS), The Netherlands 325418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers require accurate evidence on chronic disease prevalence in people with intellectual disabilities in order to apply this information into practice. This study aimed to map the broadness of literature on chronic disease prevalence in people with and without intellectual disabilities, and to explore main characteristics of these studies.

methodA scoping review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, covering 2000 to February 2020, including literature that discussed chronic disease prevalence in people with and without intellectual disabilities, with similar data collection method for both groups.

resultsNineteen studies were included. Chronic disease prevalence varied considerably between people with and without intellectual disabilities. Studies differed in their methodologies, country and age groups that were enrolled.

conclusionsPrimary care providers should interpret results on disease prevalence among people with intellectual disabilities in light of the study characteristics. Researchers should always interpret prevalence rates in the context of methodology.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityChronic DiseaseHumansPrevalencePrimary Health Carecardiovascular diseaseschronic diseasechronic obstructive pulmonary diseasediabetes mellitusintellectual disabilityprevalence

Identifiers

PMID34750946
PMCPMC9298833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.