Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750761›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Investigation of levels of perfluoroalkyl substances in freshwater fishes collected in a contaminated area of Veneto Region, Italy.

Federica Gallocchio, Marzia Mancin, Simone Belluco, Alessandra Moressa, Roberto Angeletti, Monica Lorenzetto, Giuseppe Arcangeli, Nicola Ferrè, Antonia Ricci, Francesca Russo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica GallocchioIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy. fgallocchio@izsvenezie.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0040-0368
Marzia MancinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Simone BellucoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Alessandra MoressaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Roberto AngelettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Monica LorenzettoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe ArcangeliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Nicola FerrèIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Antonia RicciIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Francesca RussoDirezione Prevenzione, Sicurezza Alimentare, Veterinaria, Regione Veneto, Venice, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · ITRegione del Veneto · IT

Funding

italian ministry of health RC IZSVe 08/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bioaccumulation of 12 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in 107 freshwater fishes collected during 2017 in waterbodies of a contaminated area in Veneto Region (Italy) was evaluated. The contamination had been previously ascribed to a fluorochemical manufacturing plant that discharged mainly perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), among other PFASs, into the surrounding environment. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) was the most abundant compound, detected in almost 99% of the fish with an average concentration of 9.23 µg/kg wet weight (w/w). Other detected compounds were perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA) (98%, 0.55 µg/kg w/w), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) (98%, 2.87 µg/kg w/w), perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) (93%, 1.51 µg/kg w/w), and PFOA (79%, 0.33 µg/kg w/w). Bioaccumulation of PFASs was species related, with Italian barbel being the most contaminated, followed by chub, wels catfish, and carp, reflecting animals' habitat use and feeding behavior. A significant negative linear relation between PFAS concentration and fish weight was observed no matter the considered species, with smaller fish having proportionally higher bioaccumulation. PFOS concentrations were strongly correlated with the concentrations of other PFASs, suggesting a similar source of contamination or a contamination from ubiquitous sources. Correlation analysis showed PFOA likely originated from a separated source, unlinked to other PFASs. Although the fishes studied are not usually consumed by local people, with the likely exception of freshwater anglers (and relatives), their consumption has been banned by Veneto Authority since the time this study was conducted. In fact, the study suggests that a medium/high consumption frequency (superior to 1 portion per month) of fish from the investigated area might result in a high exposure to PFASs.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsCarpsFluorocarbonsAnimalsFishesFresh WaterHumansItalySeafoodAlkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsExposure assessmentFishHPLC-MSMSPFAS

Identifiers

PMID34750761
OpenAlexW3213514842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.