Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750703›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Management of the colonic polyps referred for surgery: an opportunity for improvement.

Cecily Stockley, Bradley Evans, Muna Lougheed, Haley Flemming, Altaf Taher, Mark Borgaonkar, David Pace

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Temporal trends in colorectal resections for benign colorectal neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecily StockleyDepartment of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. ccs106@mun.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-1013
Bradley EvansDepartment of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Muna LougheedDepartment of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Haley FlemmingDepartment of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Altaf TaherDepartment of Pathology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Mark BorgaonkarDepartment of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
David PaceDepartment of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine local practice for non-malignant polyps and to calculate morbidity and mortality associated with bowel resection for this indication.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing our local gastrointestinal pathology database over a five-year period to identify colonic resections performed for benign polyps. Using search terms "polyp" and "adenoma," 272 cases were identified. Exclusion criteria included: cancer diagnosis, emergency surgeries, multiple resections, and subtotal colectomies for polyposis. 106 patients were included in the study. Primary outcome was perioperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included patient morbidity, characteristics of polyps requiring surgery, and the number of patients referred for a second endoscopic opinion prior to proceeding with surgery.

results64 male and 42 female patients with a mean age of 65.3 years (± 8.6 years) underwent colon resection for benign polyps. The mean polyp size was 32.7 mm (± 19.5 mm). 30 patients (28.6%) had polyps equal to or less than 2 cm. Most of the polyps described were sessile (n = 55, 51.9%) and located in the right colon (n = 84, 79.3%). Endoscopic resection was attempted in 31 patients (29.2%), and five cases (4.7%) were referred for a second endoscopic opinion prior to proceeding with surgery. Endoscopists incorrectly felt that polyps were malignant in 62 cases (58.5%). Using Clavien-Dindo classification, most patients had no complications n = 36 (34.0%) or minor complications n = 41 (38.7%). Twelve patients (11.3%) had complications that required antibiotics, blood transfusions, or total parental nutrition. Nine patients (8.5%) required surgical or endoscopic management. Six patients (5.7%) required ICU admission. Mortality rate was 1.9% (n = 2).

conclusionSurgery for benign colonic polyps is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These findings reveal a gap in endoscopic management of benign colonic polyps.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonic NeoplasmsColonic PolypsAgedColectomyColonoscopyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesColectomyColonoscopyPolyps

Identifiers

PMID34750703
OpenAlexW3211832999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.