Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750662›Full record

SynthesisCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2022

Prognostic value of soluble programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1) and soluble programmed cell death ligand-1 (sPD-L1) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jun-Shuai Xue, Hui Liu, Guang-Xiao Meng, Zi-Niu Ding, Lun-Jie Yan, Sheng-Yu Yao, Hai-Chao Li, Zhao-Ru Dong, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Jian-Guo Hong and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Shuai Xue *Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Hui Liu *Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Guang-Xiao MengDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Zi-Niu DingDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Lun-Jie YanDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Sheng-Yu YaoDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Hai-Chao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Zhao-Ru DongDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Zhi-Qiang ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Jian-Guo HongDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Tao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 West Wen Hua Road, Jinan, 250012, China. litao7706@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-1774
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSecond Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

founds for Independent Cultivation of Innovative Team from Universities in Jinan Grant No.2020GXRC023the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81874178the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073200the Taishan Scholars Program for Young Expert of Shandong Province tsqn20161064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreliminary studies have suggested that soluble programmed death-1 (sPD-1) and soluble programmed cell death ligand-1 (sPD-L1) have prognostic implications in many malignant tumors. However, the correlation between sPD-1/sPD-L1 level and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unclear.

methodsWe searched several electronic databases from database inception to October 7, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor-free survival (TFS). Random effects were introduced to this meta-analysis. The correlation between sPD-1/sPD-L1 level and prognosis was evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

resultsA total of 11 studies (1291 patients) were incorporated into this meta-analysis, including seven on sPD-L1, two on sPD-1, and two about both factors. The pooled results showed that high sPD-L1 level was associated with worse OS (HR = 2.46, 95%CI 1.74-3.49, P < 0.001; I

conclusionsPD-L1 rather than sPD-1 could be a good predictor for recurrence and survival after treatment for HCC. More high-quality prospective studies are warranted to assess the prognostic value of sPD-1 or sPD-L1 for HCC.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorHepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysisPrognosissPD-1sPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID34750662
PMCPMC10992106
OpenAlexW3212948527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.