Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Development of a rat capnoperitoneum phantom to study drug aerosol deposition in the context of anticancer research on peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Daniel Göhler, Antje Geldner, Ralf Gritzki, Franz Lohse, Stephan Große, Julien Sobilo, Clemens Felsmann, Jonathan R Buggisch, Alain Le Pape, Andreas Rudolph and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Göhler *Research Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Antje GeldnerResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany. antje.geldner@tu-dresden.de.
Ralf Gritzki *Chair of Building Energy Systems and Heat Supply, Institute of Power Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Franz LohseResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Stephan GroßeTopas GmbH, 01237, Dresden, Germany.
Julien SobiloCNRS, TAAM UPS44, In Vivo Imaging Centre for Preclinical and Translational Research CIPA, 45071, Orléans, France.
Clemens FelsmannChair of Building Energy Systems and Heat Supply, Institute of Power Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Jonathan R BuggischCNRS, TAAM UPS44, In Vivo Imaging Centre for Preclinical and Translational Research CIPA, 45071, Orléans, France.
Alain Le PapeCNRS, TAAM UPS44, In Vivo Imaging Centre for Preclinical and Translational Research CIPA, 45071, Orléans, France.
Andreas RudolphTopas GmbH, 01237, Dresden, Germany.
Michael StintzResearch Group Mechanical Process Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering and Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany.
Urs Giger-PabstDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, Universität Münster, Münster, Germany.
TU Dresden · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKlinikum Rheine · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Sächsische Aufbaubank 100374636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising approach with a high optimization potential for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. To study the efficacy of PIPAC and drugs, first rodent cancer models were developed. But inefficient drug aerosol supply and knowledge gaps concerning spatial drug distribution can limit the results based on such models. To study drug aerosol supply/deposition, computed tomography scans of a rat capnoperitoneum were used to deduce a virtual and a physical phantom of the rat capnoperitoneum (RCP). RCP qualification was performed for a specific PIPAC method, where the capnoperitoneum is continuously purged by the drug aerosol. In this context, also in-silico analyses by computational fluid dynamic modelling were conducted on the virtual RCP. The physical RCP was used for ex-vivo granulometric analyses concerning drug deposition. Results of RCP qualification show that aerosol deposition in a continuous purged rat capnoperitoneum depends strongly on the position of the inlet and outlet port. Moreover, it could be shown that the droplet size and charge condition of the drug aerosol define the deposition efficiency. In summary, the developed virtual and physical RCP enables detailed in-silico and ex-vivo analyses on drug supply/deposition in rodents.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsComputer-Aided DesignComputer SimulationHumansHydrodynamicsInjections, IntraperitonealModels, AnimalPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPhantoms, ImagingPressureRatsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUser-Computer InterfaceAerosolsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34750488
PMCPMC8575922
OpenAlexW3213490993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.