Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting in patients with carotid artery near-occlusion.

Cheng-Hsuan Tsai, Ying-Hsien Chen, Mao-Shin Lin, Ching-Chang Huang, Chi-Sheng Hung, Chih-Fan Yeh, Sheng-Fu Liu, Sung-Chun Tang, Chi-Chao Chao, Hsien-Li Kao

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Hsuan Tsai *Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying-Hsien Chen *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Mao-Shin LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Ching-Chang HuangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Chi-Sheng HungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Chih-Fan YehDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Sheng-Fu LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Biomedical Park Hospital, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Sung-Chun TangStroke Center and Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Chao ChaoDepartment of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsien-Li KaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. hsienli_kao@yahoo.com.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of endovascular revascularization in patients with carotid artery near occlusion (CANO) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the peri-procedural risk in CANO patients receiving carotid artery stenting (CAS). A prospective data base with retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent CAS with CANO from July 2006 to July 2020, and had at least 1-month clinical follow-up data. The primary endpoints were stroke, hyperperfusion syndrome, and death within 30 days after CAS. A total of 198 patients with carotid artery stenosis were enrolled including 92 patients with CANO and 106 age and sex-matched patients with 70-99% conventional carotid stenosis. Full distal carotid collapse was found in 45 CANO patients (45/92, 49%). The technical success rate was 100%. The CANO patients had significantly longer lesion lengths compared with those of the non-CANO group. The incidence of hyperperfusion syndrome was comparable (CANO: 2.2%, non-CANO: 0.9%, P = 0.598). The risks of ischemic stroke and death within 30 days were 1.1% and 0% in the CANO group; and 1.9% and 0.9%, in the non-CANO group, respectively, without statistical difference. In conclusion, CAS is safe for patients with CANO, with a similar low 30-day peri-procedural event rate comparable to those of non-CANO.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresStentsAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34750446
PMCPMC8575776
OpenAlexW3213305402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.