Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750130›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

The Lost Pillar: Does Continuity of Care Still Matter?

David Loxterkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Just a GP?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  2. Continuity in the age of virtual care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Humans Need.Annals of family medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David LoxterkampNorthern Light Family Medicine Residency Program, Bangor, Maine david.loxterkamp@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuity of care has long held a hallowed place in the halls of family medicine. Indeed, it is one of the 4 pillars of an ideal family practice, along with first contact, comprehensive, and coordinated care. But what does it mean to the patient, the doctor, and our sense of identity and purpose? And why, in recent years, has it receded from the discourse of family medicine values? This author suggests that continuity is an expression of the value we place on human relationships, a contract of sorts with the people we care for both inside and outside the office. Such relationships are not lightly discarded, for they serve us best in the long haul when our own sense of identity and purpose is tested and worn.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeHumansPhysician-Patient Relationscontinuity of carerelationshipresidency training

Identifiers

PMID34750130
PMCPMC8575504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.