Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750129›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Case Study With a Participatory Approach: Rethinking Pragmatics of Stakeholder Engagement for Implementation Research.

Catherine Hudon, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Mathieu Bisson, Alya Danish, Marlène Karam, Ariane Girard, Pierre-Luc Bossé, Mireille Lambert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient-oriented questionnaires.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine HudonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada Catherine.Hudon@USherbrooke.ca.
Maud-Christine ChouinardFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mathieu BissonDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Alya DanishDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Marlène KaramFaculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ariane GirardDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre-Luc BosséDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Mireille LambertIntegrated University Health and Social Services Centre, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case study design is particularly useful for implementation analysis of complex health care innovations in primary care that can be influenced by the context of dynamic environments. Case studies may be combined with participatory approaches where academics conduct joint research with nonacademic stakeholders, to foster translation of findings results into practice. The aim of this article is to clarify epistemological and methodological considerations of case studies with a participatory approach. It also aims to propose best practice recommendations when using this case study approach. We distinguish between the participatory case study with full co-construction and co-governance, and the case study with a participatory approach whereby stakeholders are consulted in certain phases of the research. We then compare the epistemological posture of 3 prominent case study methodologists, Yin, Stake, and Merriam, to present the epistemological posture of case studies with a participatory approach. The relevance, applications, and procedures of a case study with a participatory approach methodology are illustrated through a concrete example of a primary care research program (PriCARE). We propose 12 steps for designing and conducting a case study with a participatory approach that may help guide researchers in the implementation analysis of complex health care innovations in primary care.

Indexed as

Research DesignStakeholder ParticipationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and Consultationcase studychange, organizationalhealth care innovationhealth services researchimplementationparticipatory approachprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34750129
PMCPMC8575520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.