Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34750035›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2022

First-line Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in Patients Without Nephrectomy and With an Evaluable Primary Renal Tumor in the CheckMate 214 Trial.

Laurence Albiges, Nizar M Tannir, Mauricio Burotto, David McDermott, Elizabeth R Plimack, Philippe Barthélémy, Camillo Porta, Thomas Powles, Frede Donskov, Saby George and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02231749 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib Monotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02231749 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib Monotherapy in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2014 to 2025Enrolled1,096ConditionsAdvanced Renal Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab, Sunitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Outcomes of Nivolumab-Plus-Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Second Interim Analysis of the J-ENCORE Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Upregulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Perioperative therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Laurence AlbigesDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: laurence.albiges@gustaveroussy.fr.
Nizar M TannirDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mauricio BurottoBradford Hill Clinical Research Center, Santiago, Chile.
David McDermottDivision of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth R PlimackDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Philippe BarthélémyMedical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.
Camillo PortaUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Thomas PowlesDepartment of Urology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK.
Frede DonskovDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Saby GeorgeDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Christian K KollmannsbergerDepartment of Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Howard GurneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Marc-Oliver GrimmDepartment of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Yoshihiko TomitaNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Daniel CastellanoMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Brian I RiniDivision of Hematology Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Toni K ChoueiriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David LeungDepartment of Imaging, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Shruti Shally SaggiDepartment of Clinical Trials, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Chung-Wei LeeDepartment of Clinical Trials, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
M Brent McHenryDepartment of Biostatistics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Robert J MotzerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USAarhus University Hospital · DKBC Cancer Agency · CABeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRJena University Hospital · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNiigata University · JPQueen Mary University of London · GBRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pavia · ITVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an exploratory post hoc analysis from the phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) versus sunitinib in a subgroup of 108 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) without prior nephrectomy and with an evaluable primary tumor, a population under-represented in clinical trials. Patients with clear cell aRCC were randomized to NIVO+IPI every 3 wk for four doses followed by NIVO monotherapy, or sunitinib every day for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and primary tumor shrinkage were assessed. PFS and ORR were assessed per independent radiology review committee using RECIST version 1.1. With minimum study follow-up of 4 yr for intent-to-treat patients, OS favored NIVO+IPI (n = 53) over sunitinib (n = 55; hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.0) among patients without prior nephrectomy. ORR was higher (34% vs 15%; p = 0.0041) and median duration of response was longer with NIVO+IPI versus sunitinib (20.5 vs 14.1 mo); the best overall response was partial response in either arm. A ≥30% reduction in the diameter of intact target renal tumors was achieved in 35% of patients with NIVO+IPI versus 20% with sunitinib. Safety was consistent with the global study population. In conclusion, in patients with aRCC without prior nephrectomy and with an evaluable primary tumor, NIVO+IPI showed survival benefits and renal tumor reduction versus sunitinib. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02231749. PATIENT SUMMARY: In an exploratory analysis of a large global trial (CheckMate 214), we observed positive outcomes (both survival and tumor response to treatment) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over sunitinib in a subgroup of patients with advanced kidney cancer who did not undergo removal of their primary kidney tumor. This subset of patients represents a population that has not been studied in clinical trials and for whom outcomes with new immunotherapy combination regimens are not yet known. We conclude that treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab offers these patients a survival benefit versus sunitinib, consistent with that observed in the overall study, as well as a notable kidney tumor reduction.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansIpilimumabMaleNephrectomyNivolumabSunitinibIpilimumabNivolumabSunitinibAdvanced renal cell carcinomaCheckMate 214Cytoreductive nephrectomyIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID34750035
PMCPMC10202028
OpenAlexW3211938324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.