ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2021
The Effectiveness of Hot Bead Sterilization in Maintaining Sterile Surgical Instrument Tips across Sequential Mouse Surgeries.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One strategy commonly employed for rodent surgeries is a "tips-only" surgical technique, which restricts the surgeon to using only the sterile working ends of the surgical instruments to manipulate the surgical field and sterilizes instrument tips with a hot bead sterilizer between consecutive rodents. Despite the common use of the "tips-only" technique, research is lacking on the number of sequential surgeries for which the same set of hot bead-sterilized instruments can be used before introducing bacterial contamination. We performed serial mouse surgeries using the "tips-only" technique under 3 different conditions (aseptic, fur contamination, or cecal contamination) and assessed aerobic bacterial growth before and after each round of hot bead sterilization. Instrument tips showed an increasing probability of contamination of at least one instrument in a series of consecutive surgeries. The probability that all surgical instrument tips in the series were sterile after hot bead sterilization fell by 4% for each surgery involving inadvertent or fur contamination and by 11.5% for each surgery with contamination for all surgical types combined (including entering the gastrointestinal tract). Based on our results, hot bead sterilization is not adequate for surgeries associated with gross contamination. Under our experimental conditions and assuming independence of outcomes between consecutive surgeries, up to 5 surgeries associated with minor or inadvertent contamination could be performed in series with a probability higher than 80% that all instrument tips were sterile for all surgeries. A case-by-case risk assessment should be conducted to derive institutional guidelines for the maximal number of surgeries that can be performed in sequence using the "tips-only" technique with hot bead sterilization of the same set of surgical instruments between surgeries. Full sterilization of instruments after every surgery provides the greatest confidence in maintaining sterility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.