Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749842›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2021

Evaluation of Pain and Distress and Therapeutic Interventions for Rectal Prolapse in Mice to Reduce Early Study Removal.

Cara M Mitchell, Gregory W Salyards, Betty R Theriault, George P Langan, Kerith R Luchins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of IVC Microenvironments During an Extended Cage-Change Interval in Rats (Rattus norvegicus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  3. Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cara M MitchellAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Gregory W SalyardsDivision of Veterinary Resources Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Betty R TheriaultAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
George P LanganAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Kerith R LuchinsAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Chicago · USOffice of Research Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal prolapse (RP) is a common clinical condition in mice, that does not have a recognized or documented standard of care. At our institution, an average of 240 mice develop RP each year. Our practice has been to recommend euthanasia upon identifying a RP based on its appearance as a painful or distressful condition. This study aimed to assess treatment options that would maintain the RP mucosa and allow mice to reach their study endpoint, and to evaluate the perception of this condition as a painful or distressful event. This study used 120 mice with spontaneous RP, concurrently assigned to ongoing research protocols. Mice were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: petroleum jelly, lidocaine jelly, or no treatment. Fecal samples were collected for pathogen testing, and all mice received an initial base score, followed by weekly blind scores. Upon euthanasia, RP tissue was collected for histopathology. Of the 120 mice identified with RP, 47 mice were breeders; 28% successfully produced 22 additional litters after developing RP. Seventy-three were nonbreeders, with 92% reaching their research study endpoint. No statistically significant differences were detected between the 3 treatment groups based on gross mucosal health, pain and distress, or histopathology. In this study, none of the mice in any group were euthanized based on the RP endpoint scoring criteria. These findings demonstrate that treatment is unnecessary for RP, and mice with RP did not show signs of pain or distress. In adherence to the 3Rs, this study supports animal number reduction and clinical refinement, allowing mice with RPs to reach their intended research study endpoints or produce additional litters.

Indexed as

Rectal ProlapseAnimalsLidocaineMicePainRectumLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID34749842
PMCPMC8628532
OpenAlexW3214576722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.