Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749822›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Study protocol for a pilot high-intensity interval training intervention in inpatient mental health settings: a two-part study using a randomised controlled trial and naturalistic study design.

Rebecca Martland, Juliana Onwumere, Brendon Stubbs, Fiona Gaughran

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03959735 ("Is the Use of High Intensity Interval Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03959735 nacompletednot on this map

"Is the Use of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Feasible and Acceptable Amongst Inpatients With Severe Mental Illness (SMI)?" A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2019 to 2021Enrolled19ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, SchizophreniaArmsHigh Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca MartlandDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK. rebecca.martland@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-0171
Juliana OnwumereSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-7451
Brendon StubbsSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-3791
Fiona GaughranDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-5569

Funding

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Council PhD studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere mental illnesses (SMI), including schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, are associated with physical health comorbidities and premature mortality. Physical activity and structured exercise have a beneficial impact on cardiometabolic risk and ameliorate mental health symptomology and cognition. This protocol describes a feasibility study for a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention among inpatients with SMI, to improve their physical and mental health.

methodsThe feasibility study follows a two-part design owing to COVID-19-related adaptations to project design: (a) a non-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 12 weeks of bicycle-based HIIT, delivered twice weekly in a face-to-face, one-to-one setting, compared to treatment as usual (TAU) and (b) a naturalistic study of inpatient HIIT; eligible participants will be invited to two sessions of HIIT per week, delivered by the research team remotely or in person. Additionally, participants in the naturalistic study may use the bike to conduct self-directed sessions of their chosen length and intensity. We will measure the feasibility and acceptability of the HIIT intervention as primary outcomes, alongside secondary and tertiary outcomes evaluating the physical, mental and cognitive effects of HIIT. The study aims to recruit 40 patients to the RCT and 6-8 patients to the naturalistic design. DISCUSSION: Exercise is a modifiable lifestyle barrier that can reverse cardiometabolic disease risk. If HIIT is found to be feasible and acceptable in inpatients with SMI, there would be scope for large-scale work to evaluate the clinical, cost and implementation effectiveness of HIIT in inpatient mental health settings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03959735 . Registered June 22, 2019.

Indexed as

ExerciseInpatientInterventionPhysical healthSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID34749822
PMCPMC8573298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.