ArticleGenome biology2021
An explainable artificial intelligence approach for decoding the enhancer histone modifications code and identification of novel enhancers in Drosophila.
Article in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic characterization of pseudogenes across human tissues.Genome research · 2026Article
- Current methods in explainable artificial intelligence and future prospects for integrative physiology.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Mapping chromatin remodelling in glioblastoma identifies epigenetic regulation of key molecular pathways and novel druggable targets.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Efficient activation of hundreds of LTR12C elements reveals cis-regulatory function determined by distinct epigenetic mechanisms.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- AI-Assisted Rational Design and Activity Prediction of Biological Elements for Optimizing Transcription-Factor-Based Biosensors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Designing Epigenome Editors: Considerations of Biochemical and Locus Specificities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Integrative approaches based on genomic techniques in the functional studies on enhancers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Identifying Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Adults with Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Machine learning model successfully identifies important clinical features for predicting outpatients with rotator cuff tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Synergising single-cell resolution and 4sU labelling boosts inference of transcriptional bursting.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Role of primary aging hallmarks in Alzheimer´s disease.Theranostics · 2023Review
- ZipHiC: a novel Bayesian framework to identify enriched interactions and experimental biases in Hi-C data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnhancers are non-coding regions of the genome that control the activity of target genes. Recent efforts to identify active enhancers experimentally and in silico have proven effective. While these tools can predict the locations of enhancers with a high degree of accuracy, the mechanisms underpinning the activity of enhancers are often unclear.
resultsUsing machine learning (ML) and a rule-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model, we demonstrate that we can predict the location of known enhancers in Drosophila with a high degree of accuracy. Most importantly, we use the rules of the XAI model to provide insight into the underlying combinatorial histone modifications code of enhancers. In addition, we identified a large set of putative enhancers that display the same epigenetic signature as enhancers identified experimentally. These putative enhancers are enriched in nascent transcription, divergent transcription and have 3D contacts with promoters of transcribed genes. However, they display only intermediary enrichment of mediator and cohesin complexes compared to previously characterised active enhancers. We also found that 10-15% of the predicted enhancers display similar characteristics to super enhancers observed in other species.
conclusionsHere, we applied an explainable AI model to predict enhancers with high accuracy. Most importantly, we identified that different combinations of epigenetic marks characterise different groups of enhancers. Finally, we discovered a large set of putative enhancers which display similar characteristics with previously characterised active enhancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.