Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749757›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Shifting perceptions, preferences and practices in the African fruit trade: the case of African plum (Dacryodes edulis) in different cultural and urbanization contexts in Cameroon.

Aurore Rimlinger, Jérôme Duminil, Taïna Lemoine, Marie-Louise Avana, Armel Chakocha, Alexis Gakwavu, Franca Mboujda, Mélanie Tsogo, Marlène Elias, Stéphanie M Carrière

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Domestication Syndrome inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aurore RimlingerSENS, IRD, CIRAD, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France. aurore.rimlinger@ird.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-1580
Jérôme DuminilDIADE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, BP 64501, 34394, Montpellier, France.
Taïna LemoineCEFE Univ Montpellier - CNRS - EPHE - IRD - Univ Paul Valéry, 34293, Montpellier, France.
Marie-Louise AvanaFaculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, Forestry Department, University of Dschang, BP 222, Dschang, Cameroon.
Armel ChakochaFaculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, Forestry Department, University of Dschang, BP 222, Dschang, Cameroon.
Alexis GakwavuFaculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, Forestry Department, University of Dschang, BP 222, Dschang, Cameroon.
Franca MboujdaDIADE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, BP 64501, 34394, Montpellier, France.
Mélanie TsogoUniversity of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Marlène EliasThe Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Via di San Domenico, 1, 00153, Rome, Italy.
Stéphanie M CarrièreSENS, IRD, CIRAD, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France. stephanie.carriere@ird.fr.

Funding

agropolis fondation 1605-042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the perceptions, preferences and management practices associated with intraspecific variability of emblematic African tree crops is critical for their sustainable management. In this paper, we examine how the agrobiodiversity of a fruit tree species native to Central Africa, the African plum tree (Dacryodes edulis), is perceived and managed by Cameroonian cultivators.

methodsSemi-structured interviews and tree surveys were conducted over four months with 441 African plum tree owners from three different ethnic groups (Bamileke, Bassa, Beti) in urban, peri-urban and rural areas. Questions focused on trees owners' perceptions-including the local nomenclature-preferences and management practices related to African plum trees and their intraspecific agrobiodiversity.

resultsAcross the three ethnic groups in the study area, more than 300 different local varietal names were recorded. These were mainly based on morphological and organoleptic traits, with two-thirds of the names referring to fruit size, skin color and fruit taste. The same traits were used by tree owners to describe their fruit preferences, but their relative importance in shaping fruit preferences varied among groups. The preferences of urban dwellers from different ethnic groups when purchasing African plum fruit focused on the fruit's taste characteristics, while those of rural dwellers differed among ethnic groups. In rural areas, where African plums are sold and consumed by their growers, the preferences of Bassa consumers reflect quantity (fruit size) over quality (fruit taste or skin color) considerations. These preferences are reflected in the choice of seeds used for planting. Bassa owners sought seeds from trees with large fruits (with 34.8% of Bassa owners giving top priority to this trait as a selection criterion) to a significantly greater extent than Bamileke and Beti owners who prioritized taste and skin color instead. Among tree growers who selectively retained African plum trees in their fields, 44% considered tree productivity as a primary selection criterion.

conclusionsFindings linking perceptions of and preferences for fruit traits to intraspecific tree diversity, with attention to inter-ethnic and rural-urban differences, will help design locally specific measures to conserve the agrobiodiversity of African plum in the context of its ongoing domestication.

Indexed as

Prunus domesticaCameroonFruitPerceptionUrbanizationAgrobiodiversity conservationAgroforestrySmallholder agricultureSub-Saharan AfricaTree cropUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID34749757
PMCPMC8576868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.