Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749359›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Can Predict Therapy Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.

Ralph Drewes, Constanze Heinze, Maciej Pech, Maciej Powerski, Katja Woidacki, Andreas Wienke, Alexey Surov, Jazan Omari

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ralph DrewesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Constanze HeinzeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maciej PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maciej PowerskiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Katja WoidackiSection Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Andreas WienkeInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Alexey SurovDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jazan OmariDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEGdańsk Medical University · PLMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a pre- and posttreatment (ADC value changes [ΔADC]) predictive imaging biomarker of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsScopus database, Embase database, and MEDLINE library were scanned for connections between pre- and posttreatment ADC values of HCC and response to TACE. Six studies qualified for inclusion. The following parameters were collected: authors, publication year, study design, number of patients, drugs for TACE, mean ADC value, standard deviation, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies 2 instrument was employed to check the methodological quality of each study. The meta-analysis was performed by utilizing RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance were used to regard heterogeneity. The mean ADC values and 95% confidence intervals were computed.

resultsSix studies (n = 271 patients with 293 HCC nodules) were included. The pretreatment mean ADC in the responder group was 1.20 × 10-3 mm2/s (0.98, 1.42) and 1.14 × 10-3 mm2/s (0.89, 1.39) in the nonresponder group. The analysis of post-TACE ΔADC revealed a threshold of ≥20% to identify treatment responders. No suitable pretreatment ADC threshold to predict therapy response or discriminate between responders and nonresponders before therapy could be discovered.

conclusionΔADC can facilitate early objective response evaluation through post-therapeutic ADC alterations ≥20%. Pretreatment ADC cannot predict response to TACE.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansTreatment OutcomeApparent diffusion coefficientHepatocellular carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingTranscatheter arterial chemoembolizationTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID34749359
PMCPMC9501788
OpenAlexW3211583903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.