Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749306›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2021

Assessing an Adaptation of the Universal Parasite Diagnostic Assay for Bloodborne Parasites in a US State Public Health Laboratory.

Brooke Clemons, Joel Barratt, Meredith Lane, Yvonne Qvarnstrom, Allen E Teal, Greicy Zayas, Susan Madison-Antenucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Application of a universal parasite diagnostic test to biological specimens collected from animals.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke ClemonsNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center Parasitology Laboratory, Albany, New York.
Joel BarrattCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Parasitic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia.
Meredith LaneSynergy America Inc., Duluth, Georgia.
Yvonne QvarnstromCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Parasitic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, Georgia.
Allen E TealNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center Parasitology Laboratory, Albany, New York.
Greicy ZayasSUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
Susan Madison-AntenucciNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center Parasitology Laboratory, Albany, New York.
Wadsworth Center · USDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria · USOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USSynergy America (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For complex clinical cases where a parasitic infection is suspected, it can be difficult for clinicians to recommend an appropriate laboratory test. These tests are usually pathogen-specific and require a certain degree of suspicion for the precise etiology. A recently described assay, the universal parasite diagnostic (UPDx) can potentially provide a diagnosis of any parasite present in a specimen. Using primers that amplify DNA from all eukaryotes, UPDx differentiates several parasitic infections in blood by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the 18S rDNA locus. As the state's public health reference laboratory, the Parasitology Laboratory at the Wadsworth Center (Albany, NY) receives specimens from patients who have potentially encountered a wide variety of parasites. As such, the ability to differentiate several blood parasites using a single assay is of interest. We assessed UPDx for its ability to confirm parasitic infections for 20 specimens that were previously identified by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). This included specimens positive for Babesia microti, Trypanosoma cruzi, Leishmania tropica, various Plasmodium species, and specimens comprising mixed Plasmodium sp. infections. Results obtained using UPDx were largely concordant with the RT-PCR assays. A T. cruzi positive specimen was negative by UPDx and for two mixed Plasmodium sp. infections only one species was detected. The results obtained for other specimens were concordant. We conclude that UPDx shows promise for the detection of blood parasites in diagnostic laboratories. As NGS becomes cheaper, assays like UPDx will become increasingly amenable to use in clinical settings.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesPublic HealthBlood-Borne InfectionsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitic DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 18SUnited StatesRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID34749306
PMCPMC8832931
OpenAlexW3211961844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.