ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2021
Multisite schizophrenia classification by integrating structural magnetic resonance imaging data with polygenic risk score.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based morphological brain analysis in schizophrenia and unaffected siblings: a multisite study of potential risk markers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroimage Analysis Methods and Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Reliable Biomarkers and Accurate Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Achievements Made by Chinese Scholars Around the Past Decade.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Review
- Schizophrenia and Neurodevelopment: Insights From Connectome Perspective.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Review
- Exploring Schizophrenia Classification Through Multimodal MRI and Deep Graph Neural Networks: Unveiling Brain Region-Specific Weight Discrepancies and Their Association With Cell-Type Specific Transcriptomic Features.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2024Article
- Dissecting Psychiatric Heterogeneity and Comorbidity with Core Region-Based Machine Learning.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Review
- Psychotic Symptom, Mood, and Cognition-associated Multimodal MRI Reveal Shared Links to the Salience Network Within the Psychosis Spectrum Disorders.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Article
- Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Predicting Treatment Response in Schizophrenia With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Polygenic Risk Score.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous brain structural magnetic resonance imaging studies reported that patients with schizophrenia have brain structural abnormalities, which have been used to discriminate schizophrenia patients from normal controls. However, most existing studies identified schizophrenia patients at a single site, and the genetic features closely associated with highly heritable schizophrenia were not considered. In this study, we performed standardized feature extraction on brain structural magnetic resonance images and on genetic data to separate schizophrenia patients from normal controls. A total of 1010 participants, 508 schizophrenia patients and 502 normal controls, were recruited from 8 independent sites across China. Classification experiments were carried out using different machine learning methods and input features. We tested a support vector machine, logistic regression, and an ensemble learning strategy using 3 feature sets of interest: (1) imaging features: gray matter volume, (2) genetic features: polygenic risk scores, and (3) a fusion of imaging features and genetic features. The performance was assessed by leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Finally, some important brain and genetic features were identified. We found that the models with both imaging and genetic features as input performed better than models with either alone. The average accuracy of the classification models with the best performance in the cross-validation was 71.6%. The genetic feature that measured the cumulative risk of the genetic variants most associated with schizophrenia contributed the most to the classification. Our work took the first step toward considering both structural brain alterations and genome-wide genetic factors in a large-scale multisite schizophrenia classification. Our findings may provide insight into the underlying pathophysiology and risk mechanisms of schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.