Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749090›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry2022

The application of machine-learning and Raman spectroscopy for the rapid detection of edible oils type and adulteration.

Hefei Zhao, Yinglun Zhan, Zheng Xu, Joshua John Nduwamungu, Yuzhen Zhou, Robert Powers, Changmou Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends on vibrational spectroscopy tools in the agri-food sector.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High Precisive Prediction of Aflatoxin BFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hefei ZhaoFood Processing Center, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588, USA.
Yinglun ZhanDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Zheng XuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA.
Joshua John NduwamunguFood Processing Center, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588, USA.
Yuzhen ZhouDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Robert PowersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA; Nebraska Center for Integrated Biomolecular Communication, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Changmou XuFood Processing Center, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln NE 68588, USA. Electronic address: cxu13@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USWright State University · US

Funding

Targeted mass spectrometry approaches to understand CART processing and recepter interactionsP20GM113126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI GUO, JIANTAO · 2016 to 2025
$20.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is an emerging technique for the rapid detection of oil qualities. But the spectral analysis is time-consuming and low-throughput, which has limited the broad adoption. To address this issue, nine supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms were integrated into a Raman spectroscopy protocol for achieving the rapid analysis. Raman spectra were obtained for ten commercial edible oils from a variety of brands and the resulting spectral dataset was analyzed with supervised ML algorithms and compared against a principal component analysis (PCA) model. A ML-derived model obtained an accuracy of 96.7% in detecting oil type and an adulteration prediction of 0.984 (R

Indexed as

Plant OilsSpectrum Analysis, RamanFood ContaminationMachine LearningPrincipal Component AnalysisPlant OilsEdible oil qualityFood adulterationMachine learningRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34749090
PMCPMC10304463
OpenAlexW3209386356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.