Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749084›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental management2022

An impact assessment tool to identify, quantify and select optimal social-economic, ecological and health outcomes of civic environmental management interventions, in Durban South Africa.

Rashieda Davids, Mathieu Rouget, Margaret Burger, Kirsten Mahood, Ntswaki Ditlhale, Rob Slotow

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of water environment construction and urban landscape ecological risk based on land cover change analysis.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Rashieda DavidsSchool of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; EnviroHeart Consulting, South Africa. Electronic address: rashieda@enviroheart.co.za.
Mathieu RougetSchool of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, Saint-Pierre, Reunion Island, France. Electronic address: mathieu.rouget@cirad.fr.
Margaret BurgerEcoImvelo, Durban, South Africa. Electronic address: margaret@burgerip.co.za.
Kirsten Mahoodi4Water NPC, Howick, South Africa. Electronic address: kirsten@i4water.org.
Ntswaki Ditlhalei4Water NPC, Howick, South Africa. Electronic address: ntswaki@i4water.org.
Rob SlotowSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, UK. Electronic address: Slotow@ukzn.ac.za.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRDurban University of Technology · ZAGroundwater Center · DEUmkhuseli Innovation and Research Management · ZAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, we provide a novel approach to identify and assess social-ecological outcomes from civic ecology interventions. We quantified the impact significance of six civic (community led) interventions implemented by the Wise Wayz Water Care (WWWC) local community programme (solid waste management, water quality monitoring, invasive alien plant control, crop production, recycling and community engagement), in two communities, situated in urban to peri-urban/rural environments in Durban, South Africa. Interventions resulted in 37 outcomes, of which 36 were positive and one negative. The resulting significance scores from the impact assessment allowed for interventions and their outcomes to be compared. The socio-economic outcomes were the greatest (21), followed by ecological (11) and health outcomes (6). Outcomes included access to education and training; improved quality of life; improved terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; increase in recreation and cultural uses of natural areas; reduced health risks and increased nutrition. The most significant ecological outcomes resulted from invasive alien plant control, followed by solid waste removal and water quality monitoring. The greatest health outcomes resulted from solid waste removal and vegetable gardens, whereas the greatest social-economic outcomes resulted from the general operation of WWWC, solid waste removal, and invasive alien plant control. We demonstrate that investments in natural areas can deliver not only on enhancements in ecosystems and their services, but also for local community socio-economic and health benefits. This study provides an intervention quantifying tool for practitioners to select optimal local management interventions, that can be aligned with desired outcomes related to specific community challenges and policy requirements. In so doing, this work shows the critical role that civic interventions play to ensure sustainability, and emphasises how social-ecological systems and ecosystem services perspectives can be used in practice towards achieving sustainable outcomes.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeSouth AfricaCivic ecologyEcosystem servicesEnvironmental impact assessmentEnvironmental managementSocial-ecological systemSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID34749084
PMCPMC7615018
OpenAlexW3212104978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.