ArticleBrain stimulation
Weak DCS causes a relatively strong cumulative boost of synaptic plasticity with spaced learning.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances delayed retention after 5 days of lower-limb motor skill learning.The Journal of physiology · 2026Trial
- Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Independent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and social influence on pain.Pain · 2025Trial
- Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4 mA transcranial electric stimulation.Brain stimulationTrial
- Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025Article
- Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dose-response of tDCS effects on motor learning and cortical excitability: A preregistered study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Gait Disturbance in Post-Stroke Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Lasting enhancements in neural efficiency by multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation during working memory training.NPJ science of learning · 2023Article
- Closing the loop between brain and electrical stimulation: towards precision neuromodulation treatments.Translational psychiatry · 2023Review
- Long-term effects of repeated multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on response inhibition gains.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022Review
- Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022Review
- Multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves response inhibition more than single-target high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities.Brain stimulationArticle
- Comparative efficacy of tDCS and tACS in the context of enhancing executive function under acute stress: A randomized, sham-controlled study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectric fields generated during direct current stimulation (DCS) are known to modulate activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in-vitro. This provides a mechanistic explanation for the lasting behavioral effects observed with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in human learning experiments. However, previous in-vitro synaptic plasticity experiments show relatively small effects despite using strong fields compared to what is expected with conventional tDCS in humans (20 V/m vs. 1 V/m). There is therefore a need to improve the effectiveness of tDCS at realistic field intensities. Here we leverage the observation that effects of learning are known to accumulate over multiple bouts of learning, known as spaced learning. HYPOTHESIS: We propose that effects of DCS on synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) accumulate over time in a spaced learning paradigm, thus revealing effects at more realistic field intensities.
methodsWe leverage a standard model for spaced learning by inducing LTP with repeated bouts of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in hippocampal slice preparations. We studied the cumulative effects of DCS paired with TBS at various intensities applied during the induction of LTP in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices.
resultsAs predicted, DCS applied during repeated bouts of theta burst stimulation (TBS) resulted in an increase of LTP. This spaced learning effect is saturated quickly with strong TBS protocols and stronger fields. In contrast, weaker TBS and the weakest electric fields of 2.5 V/m resulted in the strongest relative efficacies (12% boost in LTP per 1 V/m applied).
conclusionsWeak DCS causes a relatively strong cumulative effect of spaced learning on synaptic plasticity. Staturarion may have masked stronger effects sizes in previous in-vitro studies. Relative effect sizes of DCS are now closer in line with human tDCS experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.