Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34748747›Full record

SynthesisContraception2022

Contraception values and preferences of people living with HIV: A systematic review.

Haneefa T Saleem, Joseph G Rosen, Caitlin Quinn, Avani Duggaraju, Caitlin E Kennedy

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contraception, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haneefa T SaleemDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: haneefa.saleem@jhu.edu.
Joseph G RosenDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Caitlin QuinnDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Avani DuggarajuDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Caitlin E KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Viral Load Trajectories and Dynamics among People Living with HIV in Rakai, Uganda: A Mixed-Methods StudyF31MH126796 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROSEN, JOSEPH GREGORY · 2021 to 2022
$79k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH126796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAttention to the contraception values and preferences of those living with HIV is essential to meeting their reproductive rights and health needs. We systematically reviewed the literature on contraception values and preferences among women and men living with HIV. STUDY

designWe searched ten electronic databases for articles from 1 January 2005 through 27 July 2020 for qualitative and quantitative studies of the values and preferences for contraceptive methods among individuals living with HIV.

resultsTwenty-one studies, primarily from sub-Saharan Africa, met the inclusion criteria. Contraception values and preferences were shaped by several factors: availability, accessibility, and convenience; perceived effectiveness; safety and tolerability; dual protection; fertility desires; partnership dynamics; and provider recommendations. Male condoms were a frequently preferred contraceptive method, offering an affordable and accessible form of dual protection against HIV and unwanted pregnancy. Fears of infertility and side effects decreased interest in hormonal contraceptive methods. Financial burdens incurred by HIV management and a desire to reduce dual reproductive health and HIV care burdens influenced preferences. Healthcare providers contributed to contraceptive preferences of women living with HIV, informing perceptions of safety, tolerability, and effectiveness.

conclusionContraception values and preferences among women living with HIV are complex and influenced by factors related and unrelated to their HIV status. Considering contraception values and preferences of people living with HIV will ensure that their autonomy and right to make decisions about the contraceptive methods best for them are upheld.

Indexed as

ContraceptionHIV InfectionsCondomsContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyContraceptive AgentsContraceptionHIVPreferencesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34748747
PMCPMC9519270
OpenAlexW3211955594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.