ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2022
Utility of Repeat Testing for Congenital Hypothyroidism in Infants with Very Low Birth Weight.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism among neonates from 1969 to 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Is It Time to Expand Newborn Screening for Congenital Hypothyroidism to Other Rare Thyroid Diseases?International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
- Predicting variables associated with diagnostic reevaluation of transient congenital hypothyroidism.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
- A practical gestational age-based algorithm for timely detection of hypothyroidism in premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Newborn screening and the screening laboratory: past, present and future.European thyroid journal · 2025Review
- Newborn screening for central congenital hypothyroidism: past, present and future.European thyroid journal · 2025Review
- Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess for possible missed hypothyroidism in infants of very low birth weight (VLBW) whose initial newborn screening (NBS) was within normal reference range. STUDY
designWe analyzed serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) obtained at 36 weeks of corrected gestational age or at hospital discharge if earlier (retest TSH) in infants with VLBW in the neonatal intensive care unit to determine the prevalence and factors associated with retest TSH ≥5 mU/L, a concentration requiring close follow-up for hypothyroidism. Utility of alternative cut-offs for NBS TSH also was assessed.
resultsA total of 398 infants, median gestational age 29 (range 22-36) weeks, birth weight 1138 (470-1498) g, were included in this study. Retest TSH was obtained at 49.5 (12-137) days after birth. Median retest TSH was 3.1 (0.5-27.9) mU/L. Seventy-three (18.3%) of the cohort had retest TSH ≥5 mU/L. Adjusting NBS cut-off to ≥15 or ≥10 mU/L identified <50% of infants with TSH ≥5 mU/L, resulting in 6% false positives and >70% false negatives. Multiple regression modeling indicated that 35% of variance in retest TSH value was explained by NBS TSH concentration, birth weight, and gestational age, all P < .01.
conclusionsRetesting for hypothyroidism at 36 weeks of corrected gestational age in infants with VLBL and normal NBS could identify infants who require ongoing surveillance until thyroid function has been definitively ascertained. Adjusting NBS TSH cutoffs is not a valid option for identifying potential hypothyroidism in infants with VLBW because of lack of sensitivity and unacceptable false-positive and false-negative rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.